|
[Sponsors] |
December 8, 2010, 12:33 |
Naca 0012 Cd Test
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 17 |
Hello people!
I want to test the profile NACA 0012 for differents alfa and compare the results with experimental and XFoil graphics. It should be simple, but my results are not satisfactory: ro= 1,225 Kg/m^3 Mu_air=1,75*10^5 Kg/(m*s) D=1 with these Data, i obtain the differents velocities (in m/s): Re=200K -> vs= 2,8 Re=500k -> vs= 7,102 Re=3M -> vs=42,612 Re=6M -> vs=85,224 For alpha= 0°and different viscosity theories: RE=6M Spall. Alm. K-E Stndrd K-w SST Trans.flow X-Foil(=Exper.) cd 3.31*10^(-2) 6.2*10^(-2) 3.32*10^(-2) 5.08*10^(-3) RE=1M K-E Stndrd K-w SST Trans.flow X-Foil(=Exper.) cd 2.1*10^(-3) 1.73*10^(-3) 5.4*10^(-3) RE=200k Spall. Alm. K-E RNG K-w SST Trs.flow X-Foil(=Exper.) cd 6.4*10^(-5) 1.5*10^(-4) 3.14*10^(-4) 1.02*10^(-2) For Low-Re I thought that K-omega sst could be better than K-Epsylon, but I don't see a good result...anywhere (the mesh is good, from the profes.) Thank you for your help! Ferran |
|
Tags |
naca 0012 |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
critical error during installation of openfoam | Fabio88 | OpenFOAM Installation | 21 | June 2, 2010 04:01 |
OF 1.6 | Ubuntu 9.10 (64bit) | GLIBCXX_3.4.11 not found | piprus | OpenFOAM Installation | 22 | February 25, 2010 14:43 |
Problems in compiling paraview in Suse 10.3 platform | chiven | OpenFOAM Installation | 3 | December 1, 2009 08:21 |
Problems with flat plate and NACA 0012 Lift/Force | Harly | FLUENT | 0 | June 18, 2007 11:02 |
NACA 0012 simulation results | Luis | FLUENT | 3 | February 15, 2006 12:42 |