|
[Sponsors] |
Transforming 3D cylinder into cooperable form |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
October 11, 2010, 05:29 |
Transforming 3D cylinder into cooperable form
|
#1 |
Senior Member
Mohsin Mukhtar
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: South Korea
Posts: 249
Rep Power: 17 |
Hello
Can anybody explain me how one can use hexahedral/cooper scheme in the case of a cylinder shown in figure. thanks |
|
October 12, 2010, 02:54 |
|
#2 |
Super Moderator
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41 |
extrude the 2 small cylinders in the big one.
Split the big cylinder with both generated volumes. Now source faces of big cylinder are symmetric and you can apply cooper tool
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider |
|
October 12, 2010, 05:31 |
|
#3 |
Senior Member
Mohsin Mukhtar
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: South Korea
Posts: 249
Rep Power: 17 |
Thank you Max.
Max Could you please clarify/guide me on the following points. 1. For cooper scheme to work, All non source faces must be mappable or submapple. But in a regular cylinder if the end caps are source faces and side face is "non source" still cooper scheme applies even though side face is neither mappable nor submapple. Could you tell me the reason? 2. In answering to this question you told me that source faces should be symmetric then I can apply cooper tool. Do "source faces" have to be symmetric for cooper scheme? Also if I extrude this then the geomtry will be changed. Is there any virtual splitting technique involved which can make this cooperable while maintaining its shape? Thank you again Max. Mohsin |
|
October 12, 2010, 05:50 |
|
#4 |
Super Moderator
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41 |
1-In cylinder-case, if your non-top surface isn't mappable or sub-mappable, then you cannot apply cooper (try to mesh it with tri)
2- The source faces don't have to be symmetric. But with this trick you enforce gambit having only pure cooper volumes. The geometry won't change, there are only splits. But you can mesh your initial domain with cooper, just enforce Gambit having Hex/Wedge Cooper, and choose the 4 top surfaces. Sans titre.jpg
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
flow over a cylinder urgent! | kevin | FLUENT | 8 | August 11, 2015 14:00 |
benchmark: flow over a circular cylinder | goodegg | Main CFD Forum | 12 | January 22, 2013 12:47 |
Incorrect Drag and Drag Coefficient for flow over a cylinder | ozzythewise | Main CFD Forum | 8 | June 13, 2012 07:24 |
[blockMesh] Specifying boundary faces failes in blockMesh | blaise | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 0 | May 10, 2010 04:56 |
Turbulent steady flow around a circular cylinder | Mirek Kabacinski | FLUENT | 0 | July 23, 2003 19:40 |