|
[Sponsors] |
rotating propeller in stationary baffled vessel |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
October 10, 2010, 13:21 |
rotating propeller in stationary baffled vessel
|
#1 |
Senior Member
raymond
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 149
Rep Power: 17 |
I would like to model a rotating propeller inside a stationary baffled vessel with water as the fluid inside. I had a lot of trials. Unfortunately, in all my model, the rotating propeller always rotating with the baffled vessel. I do not know which part I am making wrong. Does anyone how to model the correct model in this case? Please help me. Thanks.
|
|
October 11, 2010, 03:51 |
|
#2 |
Super Moderator
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41 |
The easiest way would be to treat your problem with sliding mesh.
Basically you need 2 regions which are not connected: rotor and stator, and then define interfaces
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider |
|
October 11, 2010, 04:03 |
|
#3 | |
Senior Member
raymond
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 149
Rep Power: 17 |
Quote:
Warning: materials in neighbor cell threads (3 and 4) of interior zone 14 are of different types (aluminum and water-liquid). This problem MUST be fixed before solving! I totally do not have idea in solving it. Please help. Thanks |
||
October 11, 2010, 04:09 |
|
#4 |
Super Moderator
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41 |
not like that.
Substract your solid region (you should have empty area instead of solid impeller) Then if your geometry enables it, draw (split) a circle around your rotor. You have now 2 regions, the disk which is your rotor, and the outer domain which is your stator. As I said you need to disconnect your 2 regions, for applying interfaces. Check online help chapter 11.2 Sliding Mesh Theory
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider |
|
October 11, 2010, 05:23 |
|
#5 | |
Senior Member
raymond
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 149
Rep Power: 17 |
Quote:
Really thanks to your help. |
||
October 11, 2010, 05:30 |
|
#6 |
Super Moderator
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41 |
what I mentionned above is just the geometry / mesh side (no physics).
How they move, can you explain later in fluent (not in gambit)
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider |
|
October 11, 2010, 06:24 |
|
#7 |
Senior Member
raymond
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 149
Rep Power: 17 |
Thanks. One more question, if I split my rotor (impeller) by using a geometry which has the same shape but larger size to my rotor (impeller) instead of a circle, does it work for my sliding mesh model?
|
|
October 11, 2010, 06:37 |
|
#8 |
Super Moderator
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41 |
no.
The split should be a circle. For undestanding, try to imagine a split like a star. If you rotate your star with 10°, you cannot superpose rotor and stator regions.
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider |
|
October 11, 2010, 06:48 |
|
#9 |
Senior Member
raymond
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 149
Rep Power: 17 |
In order to split my rotor (impeller) by using a geometry which has the same shape but larger size to my rotor (impeller) instead of a circle, does it mean that I need to use dynamic mesh?
|
|
October 11, 2010, 06:51 |
|
#10 |
Super Moderator
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41 |
if you cannot create a circle-split, then yes you will have to handle with dynamic mesh.
Can you quick post a sketch of your rotor-stator?
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider |
|
October 11, 2010, 07:11 |
|
#11 |
Senior Member
raymond
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 149
Rep Power: 17 |
Here is my initial gepmetry
|
|
October 11, 2010, 08:00 |
|
#12 |
Senior Member
raymond
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 149
Rep Power: 17 |
Here is my initial geometry to be studied. What should I do in order to have best model of the fluid motion behavior which induced by the solid impeller? Thanks a lot.
|
|
October 11, 2010, 08:24 |
|
#13 |
Super Moderator
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41 |
your picture is quite small...
As far as I saw, you can draw a circle (cylinder-surface in 3d) surrounding your impeller. You can also attach your geometry (*.dbs) if you want
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider |
|
October 11, 2010, 09:20 |
|
#14 |
Senior Member
raymond
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 149
Rep Power: 17 |
I would like to attach my dbs file. Unfortunately, it was around 1M and error during attaching. I tried to model as solution provided before and it was work. Thanks for your help. The cylinder should be just created surrounding the impeller or it should be huge enough until close to the stationary baffles?
|
|
October 11, 2010, 09:23 |
|
#15 |
Senior Member
raymond
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 149
Rep Power: 17 |
If I would like to model it with dynamic mesh, what should I do to the model setting?
|
|
October 12, 2010, 02:01 |
|
#16 |
Super Moderator
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41 |
so I received your file.
Do followings: *delete volume2 *create cylinder (height 0.2 / radius 1=radius 2=0.04 / Axis Location Positive Z) *split volume1 with the cylinder (volume4) *delete volume5 (solid) --> should be already deleted (volume2) but it's early this morning, don't want to investigate ) here we are, you have 2 regions: rotor and stator. *copy volume1 with translation (0.1 0 0) (it generates volume 5), delete volume1 *move copied volume5 with translation (-0.1 0 0) * The 2 volumes are now disconnected. Apply interfaces (one for each volume)
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider |
|
October 12, 2010, 02:23 |
|
#17 | |
Senior Member
raymond
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 149
Rep Power: 17 |
Quote:
|
||
October 13, 2010, 14:45 |
|
#18 |
New Member
anonymous
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 16 |
Hi Max, for the above mixing tank problem, may i know what is the ideal number of cells for both the moving zone and the fluid zone, in a 2.5m tall cylindrical tank?? Also, may i know how to go about setting the boundary condition in fluent?
|
|
October 14, 2010, 02:23 |
|
#19 |
Super Moderator
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41 |
There is no rule. Just check that you have enough cells where you think there is pressure drops etc...
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider |
|
October 14, 2010, 09:14 |
|
#20 |
New Member
anonymous
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 16 |
Hi Max, what about the boundary condition to set in fluent? i am not sure about the boundary condition to be use for the mixingtank
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Rotating propeller in a finite freestream velocity | asma | CFX | 9 | January 7, 2014 07:14 |
Counter rotating propeller (propfan) | Ball | FLUENT | 0 | August 13, 2008 17:14 |
Rotating Propeller | Nolin | FLUENT | 1 | September 7, 2006 00:07 |
propeller rotating at zero inflow velocity | Ammu | FLUENT | 1 | July 23, 2005 14:36 |
Solid particles in a rotating vessel with 5.7.1 | Sandeep | CFX | 0 | May 17, 2005 11:54 |