|
[Sponsors] |
2nd order and Turbulent-viscosity ratio error |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
October 4, 2010, 13:33 |
2nd order and Turbulent-viscosity ratio error
|
#1 |
New Member
jean
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 16 |
Hi,
I am working on a combustor, and for the moment I simply try to model the airflow inside of it. I designed 1/6th of it to use its periodicity. I have generated several grids with various geometries of the devices, and for some reason, I always get a "Turbulent viscosity ratio has been limited" error on some of them when I switch from a 1st order converged solution, to a 2nd order (Presto for the Pressure, 2nd order for the other variables). The problem always comes from the inlet of my device (I have specified a mass-flow inlet). Here is a picture of the turbulent viscosity ratio of the inlet, for a converged 1st order : and after a few iterations with the 2nd order : I don't know how to get rid of these viscosity bubbles. I tried to set some yplus modification, but I am not sure I am doing it correctly, and it doesn't have any effect. Here is the detail of my simulation : Green-gauss cell based implicit steady solver k-e standard model for the viscosity, with non-equilibrium wall function. I set the air as an ideal gas. The BOCO of the outlet is a negative pressure-outlet. What should I do to have a correct viscosity near my wall ? (I tried to adapt the model with a normal distance from the boundary, to refine the grid near the wall, but the error keeps appearing a few iterations after). Thanks! |
|
October 5, 2010, 05:08 |
|
#2 |
New Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 17 |
Dear jean,
I suggest you keep on iterating. The problem should dissipate. I expect your "bubbles" are caused by a sudden temperature change due to combustion. You can check if in the locations of high viscosity you have combustion taking place. |
|
October 5, 2010, 05:40 |
|
#3 |
New Member
jean
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 16 |
Thanks for your fast reply.
The problem is that at the moment, I am only modelling the airflow, with no fuel added and no combustion. I tried to keep on iterating, but these area usually spread and make the simulation crash :/ |
|
October 5, 2010, 06:41 |
|
#4 |
New Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 17 |
in that case go to
solution - monitor - limits (the path might not be exact) and change the viscosity limit. |
|
Tags |
fluent, viscosity ratio, yplus |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
RSM+2nd ordedr causes turbulent viscosity limited to viscosity ratio of.... | khsiavash | Main CFD Forum | 10 | January 7, 2016 13:30 |
"turbulent viscosity limited to viscosity ratio" | olivier | FLUENT | 11 | October 10, 2015 06:49 |
turbulent viscosity ratio for jet | serpil | FLUENT | 3 | September 19, 2014 07:19 |
On limiting to turbulent viscosity ratio! | varghese | FLUENT | 2 | November 15, 2003 09:56 |