|
[Sponsors] |
July 20, 2010, 11:22 |
Highly Skewed Cells
|
#1 |
New Member
Chris Turner
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Belfast
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi!
I am running a simulation that has approximately 500,000 cells. It is a hybrid mesh of both hex and tet cells. The tet cells are being used as this is an optimisation problem where different geometries are being modelled and compared-the tet cells seemed to offer the most consistent cell size and count for different geometries compared to the hex options. In my model, I have approximately 0.01% highly skewed cells (above 0.97). My model still converges and seems to give reasonable results so I was wondering if these skewed cells matter? There are approximately 40 cells that are highly skewed in the entire model and none of them are clumped together, it seems to be one cell here and one cell there. Does anyone know of a way of getting rid of single highly skewed cells within fluent /Gambit? Thanks! Chris |
|
July 21, 2010, 02:03 |
|
#2 |
Super Moderator
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41 |
In Gambit, if you are sure that the highly skewed cells don't come from your geometry (small angle, small edge, etc...) then you can try modifying slightly the cell's size (or Size Function's parameters).
That's my workaround
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider |
|
July 21, 2010, 05:38 |
|
#3 |
Member
Burak
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 90
Rep Power: 17 |
can we just change the mesh size of skewed cells, or must we remesh the whole domain?
|
|
July 21, 2010, 06:07 |
|
#4 |
Super Moderator
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41 |
you must remesh all the volume concerned.
As another workaround, if the highly skewed cells are direct connected to a surface, you can try to correct the skewness of the cell by moving the node (belonging to the cell) on the surface (--> Face/Mesh/Move Face Nodes)
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider |
|
July 21, 2010, 10:56 |
|
#5 |
Member
Burak
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 90
Rep Power: 17 |
my highly skewed cells are generally on(2D) or next to(3D) surface. So these recommendation will be very useful. Thanks Max
|
|
July 21, 2010, 11:08 |
|
#6 |
New Member
Chris Turner
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Belfast
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 17 |
Thanks for the info Max. In your experience, if there are very little skewed cells (0.01%) and the CFD matches experimental data, is there any need to try and eliminate the skewed cells?
I just think it may take a long time for not much improvement in result accuracy. Chris |
|
July 22, 2010, 02:19 |
|
#7 | |
Super Moderator
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41 |
Quote:
But the question is: Are skewed cells in a specific region where you need to catch something? At the other hand you reached results in agreement with experimental data, so.... I already gave up trying to fix some highly skewed cells, especially after one day of attempts, and I didn't encounter any convergence issue. Nevertheless I try to keep max skewness below 0.9 (for unstructured grids)
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider |
||
July 22, 2010, 07:43 |
|
#8 |
New Member
Chris Turner
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Belfast
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 17 |
Thanks for the advice MAX! Once again, you have been very helpful!
Chris |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[Netgen] Import netgen mesh to OpenFOAM | hsieh | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 32 | September 13, 2011 06:50 |
[snappyHexMesh] external flow with snappyHexMesh | chelvistero | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 11 | January 15, 2010 20:43 |
Highly skewed and inverted volumes in wing mesh | makaero | FLUENT | 0 | December 8, 2009 20:32 |
what to do w/ highly skewed elements? (GAMBIT) | mike | FLUENT | 5 | June 2, 2007 23:10 |
physical boundary error!! | kris | Siemens | 2 | August 3, 2005 01:32 |