|
[Sponsors] |
July 20, 2010, 11:20 |
Comparison of different mesh types
|
#1 |
New Member
Konrad Uebel
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Freiberg
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 |
Hi,
I did a comparsion of three different meshes, all the same geometry (all tets, all hexa, hybrid mesh splitted by interfaces). After a few simulations I gained acceptable (comparable) results between the hybrid and hexa mesh. The results of the tets mesh are way of. I used Ansys 12.1, 3d tube, rke, with two inlets, one tangential and the other one central and normal to flow direction (relativly high swirl number). Has anyone a idea where those differences come from? Regards |
|
July 27, 2010, 04:32 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
karine
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 158
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi
Tetra elements cause more numerical dissipation than hexa elements...Always use hexa, as far as ure geometry allows it. Regards |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[ICEM] Hexa mesh, curve mesh setup, bunching law | Anorky | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 4 | November 12, 2014 01:27 |
[snappyHexMesh] external flow with snappyHexMesh | chelvistero | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 11 | January 15, 2010 20:43 |
basic of mesh refinement | arya | CFX | 4 | June 19, 2007 13:21 |
ICEM 10 mesh question | DAK565656 | CFX | 6 | May 8, 2007 13:16 |
Icemcfd 11: Loss of mesh from surface mesh option? | Joe | CFX | 2 | March 26, 2007 19:10 |