|
[Sponsors] |
July 14, 2010, 08:41 |
Divergence Detected in AMG solver- Species 0
|
#1 |
New Member
Michael McMaster
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 29
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi all,
I am using fluent 12, I am simualting flow and water gas shift reaction through a packed bed reactor. I am also using compiled UDFs for custom reaction rates and zone specific diffusivities. For testing I run the simulation on my windows 7 PC first, initially with reactions off and product species equations off, to get a converged coldflow result before enabling reactions and product equations, then iterate to get a steady converged soloution, before going on to do various unsteady calculations. Using this same case file, and a Text journal, i intend to do exactly the same procedure but more in depth on my universities Parallel computer, which is Itanium 64 architecture, however, even though there are no problems on the Windows computer, the output text file from the console indicates that even before the first iteration is copleted, that there is: Divergence in the AMG solver- species-0 Then it just hangs I have tried reducing the under relaxation factors for the species, though the error still remains. Any suggestions would be most welcome. Thanks Also, when i cange the pressure velocity coupling from simple to coupled its no longer says anything about divergence error, however the porous regions, which have fixed values of velocity set to 0, then dont obey the fixed values rule, it appears as though its an empty cylinder Michael |
|
July 15, 2010, 16:49 |
|
#2 |
New Member
Steven Qhin
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 16 |
Hi,
Try this: In multigrid solver, change the method for species0 to F cycle, with stabilization. Good Luck |
|
July 16, 2010, 08:24 |
Ok But...
|
#3 |
New Member
Michael McMaster
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 29
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi Steven,
Thanks for your reply. I did try what you said with the f-cycle and bcgstab method, but it then said there was divergence in species 3(species 1 and 2 eqs are turned off), so i did the same for species 3, but then it said there was divergence in temperature/energy, so i did the same for it, though when i did that it just gave out this error: Error: > (greater-than): invalid argument [2]: wrong type [not a number] Error Object: 1.#qnan I have no real idea what this is about except that it might be something to do with the UDF i am using for having different regions of diffusivity. Any ideas? Thanks Michael |
|
July 16, 2010, 08:37 |
|
#4 |
New Member
Michael McMaster
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 29
Rep Power: 17 |
Steven, i also unloaded the UDF library, but the error:
Error: > (greater-than): invalid argument [2]: wrong type [not a number] Error Object: 1.#qnan Still occurs, so it mustnt have anything to do with the UDF |
|
July 16, 2010, 10:01 |
|
#5 |
New Member
Steven Qhin
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 16 |
Hi,
If the source/sink term is very big due to the chemical reaction in your species transport equation. You should use the implicit formualtion for it to stabilize your calculation. |
|
July 16, 2010, 10:45 |
Yes, ok
|
#6 |
New Member
Michael McMaster
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 29
Rep Power: 17 |
Ok Steven I will try that, though the reaction rate is specified as a volumetric reaction, occuring only in the porous zones, I.e. The catalyst particles
the rate equation is defined through a compiled udf. The rate is only of the order of 2e-2 kgmol/m3s and is only moldy exothermic. But yes, I will try the implicit method as you suggested, then get back to you, thanks again. I will also try a bit more in depth Reading of the solver user and theory section. |
|
July 19, 2010, 11:00 |
Got it sorted!!!
|
#7 |
New Member
Michael McMaster
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 29
Rep Power: 17 |
Yo Steven, i got it sorted, the error with the Temp was caused by the residual being too small for single precision solver, run in double precision
Set F-cycle with stabalisation for the species and then it works fine Thanks for your assistance |
|
October 10, 2010, 04:59 |
thanks
|
#8 |
New Member
azadeh
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 |
thank you very much Michael. you really help me
|
|
October 11, 2010, 05:28 |
|
#9 |
New Member
Michael McMaster
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 29
Rep Power: 17 |
cheers azedeh, glad the soloutions to my problems could be of help to someone
|
|
October 11, 2010, 11:23 |
|
#10 |
New Member
depan shi
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 |
hi
I have ever meet this kind of problem。 At begining, I stop the calculation of all specie equations and energy euqation, after some iterations,turn on those equations。And no divergence detected anymore. good luck to you! depan |
|
April 12, 2011, 03:08 |
error :divergence detected in AMG solver
|
#11 |
New Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: India
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 17 |
Good post really. It had solved my problem
|
|
April 13, 2011, 04:58 |
Great!
|
#12 |
New Member
Michael McMaster
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 29
Rep Power: 17 |
Great stuff, its good to know im not the only one having trouble, and that if we talk about it there may be ways to solve it.
|
|
March 10, 2013, 10:22 |
|
#13 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 48
Rep Power: 14 |
hey thread owner and all ppl replied thanks a lot .. it helped me too ... Changing the multigrid options to "F cycle" and BCG STAB .. does remove the erro but in the residual for the "H2O" i get this - "1.#QNBe+00" for all iterations
What does that mean ?? |
|
April 17, 2013, 08:31 |
heat tranfer between phases
|
#14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 231
Rep Power: 16 |
hi,
I am simulating coal combustion with E-E model (gas-solid). when I am calculating without heat tranfer between phases it works fine but with gunn model it gives problem like 'temperature limited 5000'. do you have any idea? thanks in advance! |
|
April 17, 2013, 09:04 |
|
#15 |
Senior Member
Paritosh Vasava
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Lappeenranta, Finland
Posts: 732
Rep Power: 23 |
The UDFs that work for a serial calculation does not necessarily work for parallel calculations. And while you use a cluster or a multi-core computer for parallel calculations the method used to partition the mesh also plays significant role in how the calculation takes place.
I recommend you to do all your calculations in the cluster. Also make sure that you modify your UDF in order to make it compatible for parallel process. |
|
April 17, 2013, 09:08 |
|
#16 |
Senior Member
Paritosh Vasava
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Lappeenranta, Finland
Posts: 732
Rep Power: 23 |
Also some macros in UDFs rely on the initial values of variables. To avoid this you could initialize your case (hybrid initialization is a smart choice), hook the UDF and then continue calculations.
|
|
April 17, 2013, 10:14 |
|
#17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 231
Rep Power: 16 |
thanks for the answer!But I am using 12.1 version and I am not using parallel option now. so I think in this version there is no option like hybrid in init.
do you have any other advise! thanks again! |
|
April 17, 2013, 11:21 |
|
#18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 231
Rep Power: 16 |
hi,
are you working on gasification? can you can tell me what is the Cp,thermal conductivity,molecular weight, standard state enthalpy and entropy properties for coal. I know that it differs for every type of coal but Can you give me a referance for that? thanks in advance! |
|
June 26, 2014, 10:31 |
|
#19 |
New Member
Shakirudeen
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 12 |
Hello guys,
i am having similar problem, I am working on combustion of CH4 in an ion transport membrane, when i tried the cold cases, it converged but as soon as i activated the volumetric, there is divergence, i have errors like: temperature limited to 1.000000e+000 in 4 cells on zone 2 in domain 1 temperature limited to 1.000000e+000 in 4 cells on zone 2 in domain 1 temperature limited to 5.000000e+003 in 2759 cells on zone 2 in domain 1 temperature limited to 1.000000e+000 in 832 cells on zone 3 in domain 1 temperature limited to 5.000000e+003 in 1161 cells on zone 3 in domain 1 absolute pressure limited to 1.0000+000 in 448 cells on zone 2 absolute pressure limited to 1.0000+000 in 291 cells on zone 3 absolute pressure limited to 5.0000+010 in 1 cells on zone 3 Error: Floating point error: invalid number Error Object: () kindly help me out, i still have a long way to go in my thesis |
|
April 25, 2015, 02:16 |
|
#20 |
Member
sanjeet Limbu
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 91
Rep Power: 11 |
Hi I am using the chemkin for getting the autoignition for nheptane mixture:
for mixture heptane/N2/O2/AR: 0.562/58/30/10 mole fraction ratio But unable to do it by any method .. I set the initial T=766K and Presuree= 14.1 bar 1. I tried the laminar rate- it showing error : flat Temp profile 2. If I check ISAT i gett some error about tbadhi |
|
Tags |
amg solver, divergence |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Divergence detected in AMG solver: pressure correction | emlejeen | FLUENT | 5 | December 15, 2016 00:47 |
species transport: amg divergence | luke | FLUENT | 2 | November 22, 2015 15:25 |
divergence detected in AMG solver !!! | yansheng | FLUENT | 0 | September 27, 2007 12:22 |
divergence detected in AMG solver:vof1 | rashmi | FLUENT | 1 | May 1, 2006 15:37 |
DIVERGENCE detected in AMG solver ENTHALPY | MANOJKUMAR | FLUENT | 2 | December 25, 2005 10:54 |