|
[Sponsors] |
June 11, 2010, 11:52 |
conjugate heat transfer boundary condition
|
#1 |
New Member
souviktor
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 11
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi all,
I am simulating a conjugate heat conduction problem in which a fluid is inside a glass tube having very large wall thickness.So I want to study the conduction through the wall as well as through the fluid. So I have created an axisymmetric model in gambit.Now,the problem is setting of boundary condition for the internal surface of the glass tube.This surface is in contact with the fluid as well as the glass tube. If I set it as wall what should be the thermal b.c at this wall? If I set it as interface there is initialization error in fluent, The heat flux is applied at the outer boundary of the tube. If I apply wall b.c at the internal tube wall, then the heat does not conduct to the fluid as the default b.c in fluent is adiabatic wall b.c. I am confused.can anyone please help? |
|
June 11, 2010, 16:54 |
bc for conjugate
|
#2 | |
Senior Member
|
there is a bc called "coupled" bc - if there are 2 fluids on either side of the wall, you can use this condition and input wall thickness and material property (for resistance calculation) - this will serve to transmit data across different fluid regions.
fluent manual gives a very good explanation on how to do this. Thanks, /CFDtoy Quote:
__________________
CFDtoy |
||
July 3, 2010, 01:31 |
Coupled thermal Boundary Condition
|
#3 |
New Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 18
Rep Power: 17 |
I have created a 3 Dimensional two fluid zone (fluid-solid) with one of the two of the faces coupled to each of the fluid zone. When I read the mesh file, Fluent separate the coupled face into its "shadowed face". However, I did not manage to see the "couple" option under the wall zone during the setting of boundary condition. I am wondering what could be wrong with my setting.
Appreciate if you could provide some advice. Many thanks in advance. |
|
July 7, 2010, 15:26 |
conjugate
|
#4 | |
Senior Member
|
did you check wall -> thermal boundary condition?
if you have a shadow wall..you will definitely see thermal coupled boundary condition. please check. Quote:
__________________
CFDtoy |
||
January 5, 2012, 11:25 |
Hi
|
#5 |
New Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 11
Rep Power: 15 |
I have a flow condition.
http://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/ans...flow-duct.html Please guide as I want to define the bottom of the fin at constant wall temp of 400 k. but all the adjacent walls are also coming at 400K. For a fin, In forced convection the temp should decrease , which is not happening. |
|
March 13, 2014, 10:23 |
|
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Turkey
Posts: 37
Rep Power: 12 |
hello cfdtoy,
ı have a question about coupled boundry condition. ı need help. thank you. good work. Should i activate coupled option for both wall and wall-shadow, for each side of the two-sided wall? |
|
April 6, 2014, 18:34 |
Interface resistance units
|
#7 |
New Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 18
Rep Power: 13 |
Hi guys,
I'm a little confused about the units FLUENT requires. I am modelling conjugate heat transfer from a heated body, through an interface material to a fluid. Essentially I have a scenario of Al block - Interface material - Cu pipe - Water I have set up so that the interfaces between the materials are 'wall' and I have a 'wall-shadow' in all cases. Given water wets the surface of copper, I'm assume there is a negligible inter-facial resistance there. Application of a 0 m wall thickness gives a result which is nowhere near the experimental value. So the Gap filler data sheet has a spec which reads Thermal Resistance °C-Inē/W - 0.015 However, this unit doesn't seem to appear in FLUENT, so how do I convert this to "m", which is what FLUENT wants for the boundary layer thickness. Does anyone have any experience of this. I'm guessing I'm missing a boat somewhere along the line Thanks in advance |
|
Tags |
boundary condition, conjugate heat transfer, interface, interior |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
CFX doesn't continue calculation... | mactech001 | CFX | 6 | November 15, 2009 22:25 |
Conjugate heat transfer and radiation modeling questions | shankara.2 | FLUENT | 0 | April 21, 2009 16:55 |
Conjugate heat transfer problem with porous media | piko | Siemens | 1 | April 17, 2009 16:41 |
How can I increase Heat Transfer at Domain Interf? | B.Simon | CFX | 3 | October 28, 2008 19:53 |
boundary condition for Heat Transfer | sylvain | Main CFD Forum | 4 | June 30, 2005 16:26 |