|
[Sponsors] |
May 28, 2010, 17:29 |
Trying to achieve supersonic flow in a pipe
|
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 94
Rep Power: 17 |
Hello
I am trying to create supersonic flow in a pipe. I have mass-flow-inlet and pressure outlet at exit. Pressure outlet setting should be ignored by the solver and extrapolated from the interior if the flow is supersonic. I don't have a nozzle at inlet. My Supersonic/Initial pressure setting at inlet (the static inlet pressure) is low enough, and mass flux is high enough, so velocity is supersonic at initialization. Still, the flow stays subsonic. What is wrong? Last edited by jpo; May 28, 2010 at 18:02. |
|
May 30, 2010, 12:50 |
|
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 94
Rep Power: 17 |
According to Fluent manual, "the flow must be initialized to a supersonic flow or it will simply choke and remain subsonic"
I tried setting my inlet to mass-flow-inlet, pressure-inlet and pressure-far-field. Always did FMG initialization and plotted the velocity field. I could never initialize a supersonic flow, where speed is supposed to be highest at inlet and decreases toward outlet. Then I tried patching the velocity to supersonic values. Once iterations start, it returns back to subsonic. I am running out of ideas... |
|
May 30, 2010, 17:44 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Tez
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 17 |
You can keep your exit pressure as much low as your solver allows. That value may not be physically possible, but as you stated, pressure outlet is ignored by solver when it is supersonic flow. You can keep it 1 Pa (abs) or negative gauge pressure at the outlet. If your pipe is uniform, that alone could drive the solution, on the other hand you can patch supersonic values to prevent chocking.
Hope that helps. |
|
May 31, 2010, 04:09 |
|
#4 |
Member
ali
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 58
Rep Power: 17 |
as earlier suggested , try zero exit pressure.
Regards Ali |
|
June 1, 2010, 21:09 |
|
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 94
Rep Power: 17 |
Thank you; I tried negative/low outlet pressure, but it didn't work.
"A real-life supersonic wind tunnel, for example, will not "start'' if the back pressure is simply lowered to its operating value; the flow will choke at the tunnel throat and will not transition to supersonic. The same holds true for a numerical simulation: the flow must be initialized to a supersonic flow or it will simply choke and remain subsonic." (Fluent manual, Section 26.15) Negative/low pressure at outlet may produce supersonic flow initially; Yet after sufficient number of iterations the flow converts to subsonic again. |
|
June 2, 2010, 02:54 |
|
#6 |
Member
ali
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 58
Rep Power: 17 |
try 2 things
1. give zero ambient to see flow behavior 2. increase mass flow rate at inlet incrementally , and check flow behavior Regards Ali |
|
June 2, 2010, 11:57 |
|
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 94
Rep Power: 17 |
Dear Ali,
many thanks for your suggestions... Set ambient to zero, do FMG initialization, run. Increment inlet mass flux, run again. This is what happens: Initially, outlet flow is supersonic; as soon as run starts to converge, it drops down to subsonic; because I increase the mass flux gradually, density increases everywhere. This is choking. Supersonic flow should be very different: highest velocity is at inlet, gradually decreasing towards outlet and possibly becoming sonic (M=1) there, if the pipe is long enough (Fanno flow). |
|
June 2, 2010, 13:48 |
|
#8 |
Member
ali
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 58
Rep Power: 17 |
for fanno flow in ur case , input conditions are super sonic....now as flow move along the constt area duct , normal shock will appear at certain length beyond that flow will be subsonic... right ! if your duct length is less than the distance to normal shock flow, M>=1 exist else not possible.check this link alsohttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fanno_flow#Applicationshope this solvesRegardsAli
|
|
June 2, 2010, 13:50 |
|
#9 |
Member
ali
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 58
Rep Power: 17 |
to add , if you increase inlet pressure till the location of normal shock is further the duct length you will have flow with M>=1...
try increase inlet pressure |
|
June 2, 2010, 15:50 |
|
#10 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 94
Rep Power: 17 |
The position of the normal shock should depend on inlet conditions and pipe length. For fixed inlet conditions there exist L* such that if pipe length L > L*, normal shock will occur around the pipe exit. Keeping everything the same, if L increases, the position of the shock will move towards inlet and eventually, supersonic conditions become impossible.
All this reasoning confirms your arguments. I read more about it here: canteach.candu.org/library/20040207.pdf You are suggesting that increasing the inlet pressure should "move" the cutoff length L* further from inlet. Why is that? Can you elaborate more? Appreciate your thoughts. |
|
June 3, 2010, 04:46 |
|
#11 |
Member
ali
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 58
Rep Power: 17 |
http://www.potto.org/gasDynamics/node152.php
link above gives a good description I hope it works for you. Regards Ali |
|
June 3, 2010, 10:01 |
|
#12 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 94
Rep Power: 17 |
Ali, thank you very much for the link. It is a very nice and detailed treatment of supersonic flows in a pipe.
So far, I used "no slip" walls for my pipe in Fluent. Now if I set "zero shear stress" on all walls, it means the pipe length factor 4fL/D will become zero, because f = wall_friction_coefficient/rho*v^2 Then I should be able to see supersonic flow no matter how long the pipe is. I will try this and see how it works. |
|
June 3, 2010, 18:30 |
mixture in T
|
#13 |
New Member
constantinos kast
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 16 |
I would like to make a mixture of two identical liquid (water) with different densities from two different entrances, which will lead to a common output.
it could be done in laminar flow? would help too if you receive even a simple instruction. I'm new to the program and try to find a solution to this problem. |
|
June 3, 2010, 18:56 |
|
#14 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 94
Rep Power: 17 |
Ali,
yes, it works now that I have "perfectly smooth" walls. The link you posted is a GNU-licensed free textbook and is really helpful. Now I can continue and work with "no slip" walls and examine things in detail |
|
June 3, 2010, 18:59 |
|
#15 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 94
Rep Power: 17 |
kkostas1982,
I guess it depends what is your Reynolds number. Please read http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reynolds_number And also the thread http://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/flu...-shedding.html looking specifically at "laminar", "turbulent" and "Reynolds number" there. |
|
October 26, 2015, 09:03 |
Supersonic inlet becomes subsonic
|
#16 |
New Member
Jenny Majeed
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 |
Hello..!
I'm trying to simulate in FLUENT, a very complex flow through a supersonic inlet, involving multiple oblique shocks and one normal shock near outlet. I had given mass-flow inlet conditions and pressure-outlet conditions. I'm able to get the required Pressure temperature results at the outlet, but after a few iterations, the inlet became subsonic, with a feeble velocity when compared to a high inlet mach number that i had assigned. I have tried segregated solving, zero shear-stress etc.still the inlet flow is subsonic. please advice me. Thank you..! |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
supersonic flow | Steffen | FLUENT | 6 | October 26, 2015 14:06 |
Reverse Flow at Rotating Pipe Outlet | vismech | STAR-CCM+ | 1 | August 11, 2009 11:38 |
About Turbulence Intensity (Pipe flow assimilated) | gRomK13 | Main CFD Forum | 1 | July 10, 2009 04:11 |
LES of highly heated pipe flow - incorrect results | MichalH | FLUENT | 3 | June 3, 2009 06:00 |
stepped pipe flow | Tom Cloutier | Main CFD Forum | 0 | April 20, 2003 14:19 |