CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

Fluent 12.1 - transition viscous models

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   May 11, 2010, 09:53
Default Fluent 12.1 - transition viscous models
  #1
Member
 
kdrbrk's Avatar
 
Burak
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 90
Rep Power: 17
kdrbrk is on a distinguished road
Hi,

I am trying to analyze a NACA 6 series symmetric airfoil for drag coeff. with 5 metres chord and 25 m/s. It is about 8.000.000 Re. I know that these airfoils are laminar flow airfoils.

So if I analyze them with turbulence models, do I get incorrect results even with a fine mesh? I tried k-e and k-w but the results seems more than it should be.

I think the flow is laminar on most part of the NACA 6 series airfoils about this Reynolds numbers. So what viscous model should I use?

Is Transition models in Fluent 12 will give me the best result among other models?

Thanks in advance.
kdrbrk is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 11, 2010, 10:50
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 411
Rep Power: 20
DoHander is on a distinguished road
A turbulence model that also models the transition should in principle give you a more accurate Cd. However even with a simple turbulence model (like k-epsilon or S-A) you should catch the lift coefficient for the linear part (say from -5 to 8 degrees). If your Cl is also wrong then you should check your mesh for y+ variation.

A transition model is the way to go, especially if you have access to Fluent 12.

Do
DoHander is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 11, 2010, 11:18
Default
  #3
Member
 
kdrbrk's Avatar
 
Burak
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 90
Rep Power: 17
kdrbrk is on a distinguished road
Thanks Do,

By the way, it is a 3D analysis with 1.8 meters width.
My problem is about drag force, lift is not so important since it is a symmetrical airfoil. I will try to make a custom airfoil which should have better drag characteristics.

So which transition model do you recommend?
kdrbrk is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 7, 2010, 18:10
Default
  #4
Member
 
kdrbrk's Avatar
 
Burak
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 90
Rep Power: 17
kdrbrk is on a distinguished road
I have been trying Transition SST and k-w SST and there is very litte difference between them !
Does Transition models behave like all the zone is a transition zone? (like turbulence models behave like all the zone is turbulence zone?)
kdrbrk is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 29, 2010, 12:34
Default
  #5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 148
Rep Power: 17
Jade M is on a distinguished road
For CFX, ANSYS recommends the Gamma Theta Model developed by Langtry and Menter. The documentation says that this model is widely validated. I assume that this would be the same for FLUENT.

The Gamma Theta Model is based on two transport equations, one for intermittency and one for the transition onset criteria in terms of momentum thickness Reynolds number.
Jade M is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
fluent 12.1, transition


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Transition Turbulence Models Apurva Main CFD Forum 3 September 7, 2018 06:48
Fluent jobs through pbs ibnkureshi FLUENT 5 June 9, 2011 14:43
CFX vs. FLUENT in multiphase models Hossam CFX 1 November 3, 2010 07:57
FLUENT TRANSITION WRONG? Rif Main CFD Forum 0 March 1, 2008 22:57
Advanced Turbulence Modeling in Fluent, Realizable k-epsilon Model Jonas Larsson FLUENT 5 March 13, 2000 04:27


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 17:51.