|
[Sponsors] |
Mismatch between Fluent Surface Integrals Report and Surface Line/Rake Tool |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
March 31, 2010, 12:21 |
Mismatch between Fluent Surface Integrals Report and Surface Line/Rake Tool
|
#1 |
New Member
Emily
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 16 |
Hello,
I am simulating an axi-symmetric tube where I am applying a constant flow rate to the inlet of the tube. I have written a UDF that expands a bulb that is attached to the bottom of the tube. The inlet is stationary and the tube is deforming. The UDF is working properly, but when I try to compare the velocity at the inlet at various times, I have a discrepancy. When I look at the surface integrals and show the average facet velocity on the inlet surface, I have an average velocity of 0.0082 m/s. However, when I plot a rake across the center of the inlet, I calculate an average of 0.0114 m/s. For arguments sake, I have also integrated the function of the velocity profile to account for non-uniform concentrations of the velocities when taking a random rake. I believe I should be able to do this because my inlet is a circle and does not change throughout the solution. I have tried comparing the surface integrals with the rake/line tool at various times and I am still seeing the incorrect trend. Any suggestions/explanations? Emily |
|
Tags |
inlet velocity, rake, surface integrals, velocity |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Surface integrals report: incident radiation | Novice | FLUENT | 3 | February 8, 2018 10:53 |
Total Heat Transfer Rate & Total Surface Heat Flux Mismatch | icaro | FLUENT | 0 | November 24, 2009 08:01 |
report surface area WITHOUT solit | Ralf Schmidt | FLUENT | 1 | June 1, 2007 11:23 |
monitor surface integral & report surface integral | Ning | FLUENT | 0 | March 18, 2007 13:51 |