|
[Sponsors] |
March 25, 2010, 08:03 |
CFD vs Experimetal Results for Aerofoil
|
#1 |
New Member
owhelan
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 16 |
Hi, I'm comparing experimental results obtained for a NACA 0012 aerofoil in a wind tunnel with CFD results ran on Fluent.
The CFD model was a very simple 2D, steady time, incompressible model using k-epsilon and standard wall functions. BC's were a pressure inlet and outlet and symmetry on upper/lower surfaces or fluid domain. Despite the low inlet gauge pressure of 215pa, I'm getting pressure readings on the surface of the aerofoil that lead to pressure coefficients greater than +ve 1 on the pressure surface at 9 deg and 12 deg incidence. Can anyone explain why this may be happening? Is it a problem with the wall function? Thanks Osh |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Comparison of experimental and CFD results for the VA-2 supercritical airfoil | Aurélien | FLUENT | 3 | April 24, 2024 11:39 |
DOES ASPECT RATIO PLAY A PART IN CFD RESULTS? | RIF | Main CFD Forum | 2 | January 5, 2008 14:14 |
ASME CFD Symposium | Chris Kleijn | Main CFD Forum | 0 | August 22, 2001 07:41 |
CFD JOBS and Expected Salary.... | Noel Harrison | Main CFD Forum | 11 | November 22, 2000 08:15 |
Can we quantify the fruits of CFD? | Brady Brown | Main CFD Forum | 14 | December 15, 1999 10:42 |