|
[Sponsors] |
FLUENT - fully implicit with following features? |
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
New Member
Paul
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
Hello all,
I am hoping that someone can help with my problem. I have not used a CFD before and I am just starting to work in this area, so I apologise in advance for any misunderstanding on my part, but any help would be greatly appreciated! ![]() Our group has decided to buy a CFD package and it is my task to select which one. I believe that either or both of CFX & FLUENT have all the features we require, which are: Darcy’s Law flow Reactions Two phase flow Large Eddy Simulation Heat and Mass transfer Moving boundaries Unsteady flow Timescale 2 – 10 seconds (although longer if feasible, I am not sure about mesh size yet) However I now need to determine if equations used by CFX or FLUENT are solved implicitly, semi-implicitly or explicitly, and if that can be done with all the features listed above active at the same time. If anyone with experience can help me you would be a real hero ![]() Thanks, Paul |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
darcy flow, fluent, implicit, reaction, unsteady |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Stopping a Fluent batch job AND saving the data! Possible? | Volker Pawlik | FLUENT | 13 | December 28, 2020 04:16 |
Integration of a Custom C++ Model into FLUENT | Syed Haider | FLUENT | 2 | March 6, 2018 23:37 |
problem of running parallel Fluent on linux cluster | ivanbuz | FLUENT | 15 | September 23, 2017 19:12 |
Fluent connection with simulink by TCP/IP | Tanktruck | Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming | 1 | June 28, 2009 12:56 |
Advanced Turbulence Modeling in Fluent, Realizable k-epsilon Model | Jonas Larsson | FLUENT | 5 | March 13, 2000 03:27 |