|
[Sponsors] |
please contribute with ideas: fluent and false/numerical diffusion |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
January 20, 2010, 08:54 |
please contribute with ideas: fluent and false/numerical diffusion
|
#1 |
New Member
mario
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 16 |
false/numerical diffusion is a quite classical problem in CFD.
However I think that each simulation case should have more important corrections to handle that.I am having extreme numerical diffusion! Briefly my case is this: Fully developed flow along x direction. Free Atmospheric flow between ground and 150m high plane. Ground is flat so vy and vz are zero. I use orthogonal hexaedronds with r=1.07. I am doing dispersion with species and varying schmidt number. Sct=0.7 gives high numerical diffusion, which increases even more with lower schmidt numbers (e.g. 0.4). vx velocity=(0,43m.s-1/0.4)*ln[(z+z0)/z0]. Z0=0.1m. I am doing a point source emission and there is concentration of the emitted species even at upwind of its release! Thanks for your ideas on this. |
|
January 20, 2010, 10:38 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Bernhard
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Delft
Posts: 790
Rep Power: 22 |
Where (which height) is your point source located?
|
|
January 20, 2010, 11:42 |
|
#3 |
New Member
mario
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 16 |
i am doing different scenarios
point source (~1m3) at 10 m high or 30 m high. Is that relevant for Numerical diffusion? Numerical diffusion is higher near ground (e.g 1 meter high) because wind speed is slower?! Thanks |
|
|
|