Gradient Discretization CFX vs Fluent

Scott Nordsen · December 2, 2009, 13:02

I also posted this on CFX Forum but perhaps there is a Fluent expert who has looked into this

I am a traditional Fluent user trying to compare CFX runs to Fluent runs.

A few versions ago Fluent added an option under discretization for gradients

1) Green-Gauss Node based
2) Green-Gauss Cell based
3) Least Squares Cell based

I am having trouble finding help on 1) does CFX have similar options 2) what is CFXs default

If a simple answer exists (i.e. CFX only does #2 from the list above) that would be great.

Thanks in advance

sbaffini · December 3, 2009, 19:50

I don't have experience with CFX or finite element methods but in Fluent those three methods are used for the computation of the gradients in the cell centers. These, in turn, are used for the diffusive fluxes and for any convective scheme different from the 1st order upwind.

The method 1 and 2 are similar as both are based on an approximation of the gauss theorem. As this approximation requires the cell face values, the two methods differ by the way these face values are calculated. In the cell based method they are simply calculated as a simple average from the two cells adjacent to the face. In the node based method the face values are computed by a weighted average of the values in the nodes of the face. These in turn are calculated by an additional weighted average from the surrounding cells.

The node based method should be more accurate than the cell based one (it should be at least 1st order accurate on any grid)

December 2, 2009, 13:02	Gradient Discretization CFX vs Fluent	#1
Scott Nordsen New Member Join Date: Jun 2009 Posts: 13 Rep Power: 17	I also posted this on CFX Forum but perhaps there is a Fluent expert who has looked into this I am a traditional Fluent user trying to compare CFX runs to Fluent runs. A few versions ago Fluent added an option under discretization for gradients 1) Green-Gauss Node based 2) Green-Gauss Cell based 3) Least Squares Cell based I am having trouble finding help on 1) does CFX have similar options 2) what is CFXs default If a simple answer exists (i.e. CFX only does #2 from the list above) that would be great. Thanks in advance

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
CFX or FLuent?	michelle	CFX	7	June 10, 2014 08:38
Fluent and CFX	Ale	Main CFD Forum	7	July 30, 2008 22:14
Fluent Vs CFX, density and pressure	Omer	CFX	9	June 28, 2007 05:13
Reynolds Stress Model in Fluent Vs CFX	Tim	FLUENT	0	December 6, 2005 23:03
CFX vs STAR-CD and Fluent	William	CFX	20	October 29, 2001 14:55

December 3, 2009, 19:50		#2
sbaffini Senior Member Paolo Lampitella Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Italy Posts: 2,195 Blog Entries: 29 Rep Power: 39	I don't have experience with CFX or finite element methods but in Fluent those three methods are used for the computation of the gradients in the cell centers. These, in turn, are used for the diffusive fluxes and for any convective scheme different from the 1st order upwind. The method 1 and 2 are similar as both are based on an approximation of the gauss theorem. As this approximation requires the cell face values, the two methods differ by the way these face values are calculated. In the cell based method they are simply calculated as a simple average from the two cells adjacent to the face. In the node based method the face values are computed by a weighted average of the values in the nodes of the face. These in turn are calculated by an additional weighted average from the surrounding cells. The node based method should be more accurate than the cell based one (it should be at least 1st order accurate on any grid)