|
[Sponsors] |
October 19, 2009, 13:50 |
Boussinesq Assumption
|
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 78
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi all,
I've read that the Boussinesq assumption linearized the relationship between the turbulent stresses and the mean strain rate, so: u_i*u_j=2/3*k*del_ij - 2*nu_t*S_ij I've also seen people say that the Boussinesq assumption makes the normal stresses isotropic, so: uu=vv=ww=2/3*k My question is where does the second term go? Does the Boussinesq assumption also assume that du/dx = dv/dy = dw/dz = 0? Thanks! |
|
October 22, 2009, 09:57 |
|
#2 |
Member
JP
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 57
Rep Power: 18 |
When the normal stresses are made isotropic, the first term vanishes and you have the linearized equation for the turbulent shear stress (second term)
as: tau_xy = mu_t * du/dy where mu_t is the turbulent viscosity |
|
October 22, 2009, 11:12 |
|
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 78
Rep Power: 17 |
Thanks, but why does the first term vanish? It should vanish if the Kronecker delta is zero, which happens for the off-diagonal terms, not the diagonal terms.
I'm clearly still confused. I appreciate your help! |
|
October 26, 2009, 06:11 |
|
#4 |
Member
Krishna
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 34
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi,
Expression for Tou ij =2*mue_t*Sij-2/3*k*rho*del_ij; Sij=2(dui/dxj+duj/dxi)----------Terms here are time averaged. When i=j; Sii=0 for incompressible flows. Recollect the time averaged continuity equation. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Natural Convection in a storage tank - boussinesq? | Jervds | CFX | 6 | October 2, 2016 03:53 |
Density boussinesq Problem | matrix-1.0 | FLUENT | 9 | January 17, 2014 22:17 |
Boussinesq | lucifer | FLUENT | 0 | September 26, 2009 10:31 |
Boussinesq - natural convection | Jeremie | FLUENT | 2 | March 8, 2007 09:12 |
GAMBIT: Assumption of an edge type while meshing | Agnes | FLUENT | 0 | June 22, 2005 14:37 |