|
[Sponsors] |
Integral Length Scale vs Turbulent Length Scale |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
August 4, 2009, 12:42 |
Integral Length Scale vs Turbulent Length Scale
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 17 |
I have a paper that specifies an integral length scale, L.
The input option for fluent is for a turbulent length scale, l. The paper does not specify how the value, L, was measured, though I assume it was a trait of the turbulence grid. My question: is there a "standard" approach to convert L to l for use in Fluent. Granted this may not be correct, but at least it is standard. Thanks Scott |
|
April 15, 2013, 07:27 |
|
#2 |
New Member
Paulina
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 23
Rep Power: 14 |
I have the same question.
If I know that for external flow in area with low buildings L=140m. What turbulent length scale should I define in CFD? Paulina |
|
January 20, 2014, 02:17 |
|
#3 |
New Member
LouisK
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Shanghai,China
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 13 |
||
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Turbulent length scale setting | realanony87 | CFX | 5 | October 14, 2012 19:03 |
Turbulent Characteristic Length/Turbulent Length Scale | fluentnoob | FLUENT | 2 | July 3, 2009 09:40 |
turbulent length scale | Cathy | FLUENT | 1 | July 9, 2003 08:13 |
Von Karman Integral Length Scale | Txingurri | Main CFD Forum | 0 | May 2, 2002 13:05 |