CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

Fluent VOF Volume of Fluid Realistic Solution Problem

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   June 3, 2009, 08:04
Default Fluent VOF Volume of Fluid Realistic Solution Problem
  #1
New Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0
wormik is on a distinguished road
Hello all, this is my first post, I hope anybody can help me here.

I want to model a full fuel tank and the fuel movement in a wing, but before that I wanted to learn the aspects of VOF and real-time animation of it.

I have constructed a simple tank model. In it, I have put the water volume in an oblique angle in the bottom part of the tank. Then I have defined the gravity which is -9.8 m/s2 in Z direction. From start, with gravity, the water should move in the tank and settle down a little bit.

Using VOF model and with time-step 0.05 secs, I had 1200 iterations and 1200 .dat files to construct the animation. Since time-step is 0.05 secs, 1200 iterations make 60 secs with 20 solutions (frames) per second.

Then I used TecPlot to construct the animation movie, telling it that "you should use 20 solutions (.dat files) to construct 1 second of animation" With these settings I had 60 sec animation movie. But it does not seem realistic. The flow is so sluggish like it is not water, like it is a lot more thicker fluid. When I speed up the movie like 60 frames per second, it is more realistic. But then the reason why I make this animation comes to my mind. I should determine the exact points in animation that can be trouble for the design. I could not trust the computation of Fluent.

Do you have any similar experience or suggestions regarding this?

Please correct me if I am wrong:

since time-step is 0.05 sec, 20 steps make 1 sec.
I should use 20 frames (.dat files) to construct 1 sec of animation.
1200 steps (.dat files) make 1200 frames and from 20 frames per second I should have a realistic 60 secs movie, which I did not.

Regards
wormik is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 12, 2009, 16:30
Default fuel tank slashing
  #2
New Member
 
sadrooz
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 17
hamed_roozegar is on a distinguished road
this may be useful .
http://rapidshare.com/files/233767574/tank-sloshing.pdf.html
http://dl.free.fr/getfile.pl?file=/MB3v98CX *fuel tank sloshing*
hamed_roozegar is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 12, 2009, 16:40
Default fuel tank slashing
  #3
New Member
 
sadrooz
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 17
hamed_roozegar is on a distinguished road
this might be useful
http://rapidshare.com/files/233767574/tank-sloshing.pdf.html
http://dl.free.fr/getfile.pl?file=/MB3v98CX *fuel tank sloshing*
hamed_roozegar is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 21, 2009, 08:04
Default
  #4
New Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0
wormik is on a distinguished road
Thank you so much! I will look into them in detail.

That was the example I have always faced into when I made a google search. Thanks a lot!
wormik is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
animation, real-time, time-step, vof, volume of fluid


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[blockMesh] BlockMesh FOAM warning gaottino OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 7 July 19, 2010 15:11
IcoFoam parallel woes msrinath80 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 9 July 22, 2007 03:58
Rev: Can Fluent 6.0.20 predict this problem right? Yazid Bindar FLUENT 5 March 6, 2003 04:09
Terrible Mistake In Fluid Dynamics History Abhi Main CFD Forum 12 July 8, 2002 10:11
Simulation of Two Phase Fluid Flow Problem Using Fluent 5.0 Mohammad Al-Shannag Main CFD Forum 1 July 16, 1999 12:28


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:34.