|
[Sponsors] |
[Urgent] Need help for defining boundary conditions |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
March 18, 2009, 23:53 |
[Urgent] Need help for defining boundary conditions
|
#1 |
New Member
tang jingwei
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi all,
I'm modeling a channel flow with a winglet using Gambit, as proposed in the attached figure: http://img27.imageshack.us/my.php?image=helpj.jpg The boundaries that i'm currently using are: 1. Inlet: Velocity inlet 2. Outlet: Pressure outlet 3: Side walls: Periodic 4: Top wall: Symmetry 5: Bottom wall: Wall 6. Winglet: Wall When i open the mesh file using the above-mentioned boundary conditions in FLUENT, there is a error message that says that it can't read the winglet boundary type as stated below: ================================== materials, interface, domains, zones, default-interior pressure_outlet velocity_inlet bottomwall upperwall Skipping zone wall (not referenced by grid). side_walls Skipping thread 3 of domain walls_shadow (not referenced by grid). fluid shell conduction zones, Done. ================================== Why is that so? Also, I have a few other questions in mind: 1. As in the attached figure, the boundary at the side wall is defined as free slip. Is periodic boundary that correct boundary type to use? 2. I do not understand why the author of this paper on one hand states that the top wall is defined as a no-slip wall, in the other he states that the velocity is parabolic (i.e., Velocity_max at the top wall and Velocity=zero at the bottom wall) |
|
March 19, 2009, 00:17 |
|
#2 |
New Member
tang jingwei
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 17 |
add:
I have checked the mesh in Gambit, it seems to be alright: http://img14.imageshack.us/my.php?image=help2e.jpg |
|
March 19, 2009, 22:01 |
|
#3 |
New Member
tang jingwei
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 17 |
any help pertaining to any part of the above question is welcomed!
P/S: With regards to the problem I had in the fluent as posted in #1, I think it is b/cos I run 3ddp in fluent, thus it is unable to recognise the 2D triangular structure inside. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Defining "Neutral" boundary conditions? (force=0) | MW | FLUENT | 5 | October 5, 2009 05:55 |
Defining Boundary Conditions in GAMBIT | Tim R | FLUENT | 3 | April 14, 2008 05:30 |
Batch Mode : re-defining boundary conditions | MaxiFLOW | CFX | 6 | March 29, 2007 09:41 |
Defining Boundary conditions in gambit | anthro | FLUENT | 2 | February 14, 2007 10:17 |
[Commercial meshers] Defining boundary conditions on interior faces | melanie | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 9 | August 10, 2006 10:52 |