CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

Flow Between Two Parallel Plate

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   March 18, 2009, 02:04
Default Flow Between Two Parallel Plate
  #1
New Member
 
Mustafa Ayad
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 17
interawe is on a distinguished road
Hi
I want to simulate the Flow Between Two Parallel Plate in fluent one of plate is moving how can i do that.
Regards.
interawe is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 20, 2009, 04:37
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 225
Rep Power: 18
paka is on a distinguished road
Create model with two plates, then apply to one of the models UDF function describing its motion.
paka is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 20, 2009, 08:06
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Mustafa Ayad
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 17
interawe is on a distinguished road
Hi friend
Thanks for your replay, I want to tell you that my two plates on is horizontal and the other is incline by an angle (Alfa) how can I do the udf for for the incline plate I can do for horizontal plate .
Regards.
Mustafa
interawe is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 20, 2009, 14:18
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 225
Rep Power: 18
paka is on a distinguished road
Calculate its motion in its coordinates. Then apply this function to UDF. I would advise you to go through whole UDF Fluent Documentation and to get over UDF tutorials.

As far as I remember, in UDF I guess you cannot define really displacement, the only thing (I might be mistaken, this is only what I think I remember) is to define the velocity or acceleration of one of the boundaries.

For example, I would define velocity function which corresponds to your boundary motion. Then monitor (Surface->Monitors) BC motion, by dumping displacements (Grid tab in X and Y) in x and y direction into two separate files. This way from your previous calculation (I would do first a stand alone Excel, C, Python, or whatever else) verify your results comparing output from Fluent to your routine.

Hope this helps,
Krst
paka is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 21, 2009, 09:25
Default moving walls
  #5
New Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 18
Rep Power: 17
mbernard is on a distinguished road
Hello. I think there's an eaisier and faster way to do that stuff. I think you can aplly a velocity to your walls in the Boudary conditions paneL. you can fin d a part called " moiving wall" where you can define the velocity of your boundary.
Let us know about the solution you choose

Regards
mbernard is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 22, 2009, 17:13
Default
  #6
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 225
Rep Power: 18
paka is on a distinguished road
Yes, actually that is true. Forgive me, sometimes too much sophisticated work stop making you think simple way

You can definitely apply velocity to your BC.

Best,
Krst
paka is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 23, 2009, 05:51
Default
  #7
New Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 18
Rep Power: 17
mbernard is on a distinguished road
hi
Don't worry about your answer, which is more accurate than mine.
mbernard is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Flow between two parallel plate Mustafa Ayad FLUENT 1 February 23, 2009 08:08
Flow in a parallel plate Andre FLUENT 0 November 24, 2008 15:37
flow thru parallel plate with solid heat generater cindy FLUENT 1 October 10, 2005 23:54
Parallel Plate Rheometer vs Cone & Plate beginner Main CFD Forum 0 March 19, 2003 12:49
Nondimensionlization on Parallel-plate Juhee Lee Main CFD Forum 1 October 25, 2000 14:50


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 20:13.