|
[Sponsors] |
February 11, 2009, 22:33 |
confused by "periodic Non-Conformal Grids"
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,everyone!
I am reading the "fluent 6.3 user's guide" these days. But I am confused by two of the Requirements and Limitations of Non-Conformal Grids: 1. For 3D cases, if the interface is periodic, only one pair of periodic boundaries can neighbor the interface. 2. Periodic interfaces require conformal periodics adjacent to it. For example, when you calculate just one channel and blade of a fan, or turbine, etc., you must have conformal periodics on either side of the interface threads. This will not work with nonconformal periodics. Can anyone help me ? Thanks in advance. Regars, Turbinesv |
|
February 12, 2009, 10:00 |
Re: confused by "periodic Non-Conformal Grids"
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
AERO is useless
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
conformal vs. non conformal mesh | otho | Main CFD Forum | 2 | May 30, 2008 12:11 |
3D non-conformal periodic boundary conditions | Simon Riverin | FLUENT | 4 | February 23, 2007 02:35 |
non-conformal(non-matching) mesh for periodic BC? | hui | FLUENT | 0 | October 16, 2006 04:38 |
Confused | F | Main CFD Forum | 6 | August 9, 2004 06:32 |
Confused | littlelz | Main CFD Forum | 8 | October 23, 2003 13:43 |