|
[Sponsors] |
January 28, 2009, 13:00 |
Time in Steady State DPM
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hello
I have a problem with using the time in for a Define_DPM_Body_Force UDF I have written, (with fixed timestep). For no reason that I can understand, if I define a real called time and update this every iteration as time = P_TIME(p), after 1.55E-2s it becomes unbound and then 'not a number'. If I update as time = time + P_DT(p) it can reach 3.1E-2s before crashing. However in a different Body_Force UDF similar methods have caused no problem (5s). Can anyone see a way into understanding this? Cheers. Kris |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
false time step implementation for steady state | Kushagra | CFX | 1 | June 22, 2008 20:06 |
time to reach steady state with transient simulati | prabhu | CFX | 2 | April 21, 2008 11:18 |
Time to reach steady state for cavity flow? | Quarkz | Main CFD Forum | 8 | July 15, 2005 22:42 |
Steady state verses Time accurate simulations | Saud khashan | Main CFD Forum | 2 | May 23, 2003 08:00 |
Psedo-time steps in Steady state problem | Blackdraft | FLUENT | 0 | July 14, 2002 06:23 |