|
[Sponsors] |
September 19, 2008, 03:19 |
Heat Exchanger Efficiency
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi All,
I'm modelling a 3D cross flow heat exchanger with a simple hex mesh less than 200,000 cells. I'm running on default convergence criteria of 3 orders of magnitude residual decay. The boundary conditions specified are for the exhaust air into HX and fresh air into HX both at a certain temp and mass flow rate, however the exhaust flow rate is double the fresh air supply flow rate. Outlets are pressure outlets. The heat exchanger efficiency I'm getting simply by ratio of two temps is about 40% higher than my experimental values which are quite accurate. I'm just using the energy equation and shell conduction, not any specific heat exchanger models. Is there any way to bridge the gap in simulation and experimental efficiencies? I assume that if I use a denser mesh and stricter convergence criteria it will simply become more efficient in CFD...? Thanks for reading this |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
heat exchanger | pratap behera | FLUENT | 3 | August 11, 2010 00:56 |
heat exchanger | Nicolás | FLUENT | 0 | August 29, 2007 11:17 |
Heat Exchanger...TWO | Walid | CFX | 2 | July 11, 2005 20:04 |
Heat Exchanger | wawang | FLUENT | 0 | January 21, 2005 16:50 |
Convective Heat Transfer - Heat Exchanger | Mark | CFX | 6 | November 15, 2004 16:55 |