|
[Sponsors] |
T-junction hexahedral gambit meshing (same radius) |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
June 9, 2008, 10:56 |
T-junction hexahedral gambit meshing (same radius)
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hello I have to mesh a T-junction composed of two cylinders with the same radius. I want to get hexahedral elements for my mesh. I don't know how I have to decompose my geometry. I would like to get some ideas. Thank you very much Florence
|
|
June 9, 2008, 16:15 |
Re: T-junction hexahedral gambit meshing (same rad
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi Florence. Go to tutorial nş3 in Gambit documentation the title is something like "3 pipe junction". There you´ll have a good explanation. Good luck!
|
|
June 10, 2008, 03:48 |
Re: T-junction hexahedral gambit meshing (same rad
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hello HSeldon Thank you but I have already done this tutorial and I tried to inspire myself with it, but I met an error of gambit. I want to mesh a logical tetrahedra with the Tet Primitive Scheme but Gambit says me that the connectivity of my volume doesn't allow the Tet Primitive Scheme. I tried to disconnect the faces of my volume, but it didn't work. I searched on books what are the connectivity conditions for Tet Primitive Scheme, no success. I don't know how to deal with this error. Thanks Florence
|
|
June 11, 2008, 18:31 |
Re: T-junction hexahedral gambit meshing (same rad
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Did you try meshing the central volume of the intersection and then mesh the rest with hex cooper scheme?
Take care. |
|
June 11, 2008, 18:43 |
Re: T-junction hexahedral gambit meshing (same rad
|
#5 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
A piece of text taken from Gambit documentation, hope this helps!
The Tet Primitive volume meshing scheme applies only to volumes that constitute logical tetrahedra. To constitute a logical tetrahedron, a volume must include only four sides, each of which constitutes a logical triangle. Cya |
|
June 12, 2008, 03:49 |
Re: T-junction hexahedral gambit meshing (same rad
|
#6 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hello HSeldon
Finally, I found a way to solve my problem. I split my intersection volume with three "cylinders" and then I used cooper scheme in the good order. _______________________________________ | | | | | | | /\ | | _________________ ____________________ | | | | __ | | | | Here a scheme the decomposition I used. The radius are the same. I hope my scheme won´t be destroy. Thank you for your help Florence |
|
January 5, 2010, 07:27 |
|
#7 |
New Member
joe star
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 17 |
I know its quite an old post but I'm interested to know how you managed to mesh the pipe t junction using the cooper scheme. Any help would be much appreciated
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Tetrahedral vs. Hexahedral Meshing for CFD | Andy Bartels | Main CFD Forum | 16 | September 20, 2019 11:06 |
Gambit: decomposing T-junction geometry | John | FLUENT | 9 | August 1, 2012 16:27 |
T-junction meshing in Gambit | David Friis Aarup | FLUENT | 0 | October 28, 2008 06:29 |
T junction - meshing wall zone in Gambit | John | FLUENT | 3 | August 29, 2005 11:09 |
t-junction hexahedral gambit meshing | solomon | FLUENT | 1 | April 30, 2003 14:32 |