|
[Sponsors] |
April 4, 2008, 17:16 |
Combustion- eddy-dissipation-model
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hej, I want to model combustion. I've set up the case with the eddy-dissipation-model. Turbulence modeling is covered by rke and enhanced wall-treatment. y_plus is around 1. The flow field converges (including the dpm-data). But the moment I enable the energy equation to be solved, the residuals for k and e become very large. Fluent detects divergence. Trying to lower the relaxation factors for turbulent quantities makes Fluent diverge in respect to temperature or causes a NAN-Error (it depends...) The temperature exceed the 5000K-limit as well. Has anyone experienced this before and could give me a hint, please? Regards! Joerg
|
|
April 5, 2008, 10:26 |
Re: Combustion- eddy-dissipation-model
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
hi, you have to verify matierials properties .Can you specify what type of fuel you use? If you are using methane you can try to put the dilute approximation to constant.
|
|
April 5, 2008, 12:02 |
Re: Combustion- eddy-dissipation-model
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I use liquid diesel (c10h22) as droplets. The dilute approx is set to be constant. The fuel mixture consists of gaseous diesel phase (fuel), o2 (oxidizer), n2. The reactants are co2 and h20. The stochiometric values of the reaction are specified correctly. Thanks for your input... I'll double-check the materials!
|
|
April 8, 2008, 18:30 |
convergence achieved but no evaporation
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hello all of you, I've managed to fix the divergence problem. But now there is no evaporation of the liquid phase. Combustion takes not place, therefore. Any hints would be very appreciated! Regards, joerg.
|
|
April 16, 2008, 18:02 |
Re: convergence achieved but no evaporation
|
#5 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
try patch.........i.e add a energy source to your mesh........this will not affect your final solution........ hope it helps........
|
|
April 17, 2008, 18:43 |
Re: convergence achieved but no evaporation
|
#6 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I've patched the injection zone to 2000K already. Nothing happens... My next try was raising the temperature of the flow at the inlet a small value (4 Kelvin) above evaporation temperature. This doesn't help either. Hmm... I'm clueless... Any other help? Thank you! btw: Is it normal that the patched volume "disappears" after patching a certain value into this zone? Thanks for sharing your ideas, Hitesh! Regards, joerg.
|
|
December 10, 2012, 02:56 |
|
#7 |
Member
Prakash Ghose
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 34
Rep Power: 14 |
OK I will give you a suggestion. Surely you will get evaporation. Go to material and increase the value of binary diffusion of diesel droplet liquid from 3.66e-6 to 3.66e-4. then watch
|
|
December 17, 2012, 15:41 |
|
#8 |
New Member
Mina
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 14 |
Are you using unsteady tracking and injection ? if yes try to increase the size of the time step
also the convection/diff. option will affect the evaporation (do not use it ) use only diffusion |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Eddy Dissipation Model | Enots | CFX | 11 | August 12, 2011 05:11 |
Eddy Dissipation Model | Fred | CFX | 5 | May 4, 2010 12:08 |
EDDY DISSIPATION MODEL | PID | CFX | 0 | July 22, 2008 19:52 |
Eddy dissipation model | ioana | CFX | 1 | June 10, 2004 15:15 |
Eddy Dissipation Model | Thomas | Main CFD Forum | 2 | November 7, 2002 08:19 |