|
[Sponsors] |
April 4, 2008, 02:36 |
enhanced once again
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
HI, experts.
1) As far as I've understood from Chen and Patel paper, the two-layer approach they offered with the use of info from Wolfstein is a closed form solution. Am I right? Is this approach actually used in Fluent together with k-e ans RSM? 2) Where the blending function of Kader are used? Are they restricted to k-w and LES in Fluent? 3) Is this right: using enhanced wall treatment with k-e requires y+~1 at all the walls. 4) Is the following correct: while using k-w one does not need to worry about y+ because there are blending function of Kader that bridge the wall to the main flow depending on the near-wall mesh resolution (adding be aware of not having the closest cell in the buffer). |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Enhanced Wall Treatment | Phil | FLUENT | 4 | August 20, 2007 10:21 |
enhanced wall treatment | Hugo | FLUENT | 0 | January 11, 2007 10:52 |
enhanced wall treatment | saeed | FLUENT | 5 | September 6, 2006 12:38 |
Enhanced Wall Treatment? | Marius | FLUENT | 0 | January 5, 2006 06:25 |
enhanced wall | co2 | FLUENT | 2 | May 20, 2004 13:22 |