|
[Sponsors] |
Time Accuracy of the NITA - FRACTIONAL STEP method |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
March 19, 2008, 06:37 |
Time Accuracy of the NITA - FRACTIONAL STEP method
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hello,
i'm trying to perform some accuracy tests of the NITA - FRACTIONAL STEP time integration scheme employed in Fluent using the Taylor Test Case, which is a double periodic array of vortex whose kinetic energy is decaying in time. I performed several simulations with several grids, domains, boundary conditions, pressure interpolation schemes and space discretizations but i have misleading results. Using exactly the same conditions cited in the paper Sung-Eun Kim Boris Makarov An Implicit Fractional-Step Method for Efficient Transient Simulation of Incompressible Flows AIAA 2005-5253 |
|
March 19, 2008, 06:45 |
Re: Time Accuracy of the NITA - FRACTIONAL STEP me
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Sorry, i pushed the wrong button.
Using the same conditions cited in the paper, i obtain the same results cited there, a 2nd order accurate in time scheme. But, just going outside the conditions cited there, i always obtain only a first order time accurate scheme. So i'd like to know if someone has experience in this or even know if there are some other papers where the scheme has been more rigorously tested and with which compare my results. Thanks a lot, any help is appreciated |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Comparing between the Fractional step method and the SIMPLE method | ghlee | Main CFD Forum | 1 | April 10, 2012 17:59 |
Time accuracy of NITA - FRACTIONAL STEP in Fluent | Paolo Lampitella | Main CFD Forum | 0 | March 19, 2008 08:20 |
Question about fractional step method | Harish | Main CFD Forum | 2 | September 25, 2006 10:29 |
fractional step method | Fuka | Main CFD Forum | 1 | March 23, 2006 18:01 |
Fractional Step Method interpretation | Jean-François Corbett | Main CFD Forum | 2 | March 1, 2006 11:38 |