|
[Sponsors] |
March 3, 2008, 14:40 |
Difference in lift, inviscid comp. to viscid
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Dear all,
I am simulating 2D-airfoils in a subsonic flow. Relevant for me is the total lift (force in y-direction). The strongly differing results from inviscid calculations compared to k-epsilon calculations (10 to 20% depending on the airfoil and angle of incidence) surprised me. I would expect some increase in pressure due to drag but not this much. Do any of you have experienced the same and maybe know a percentage figure of the difference that is to be expected? Are there more reasons for this difference? Thank you in advance for your help Greetings Stephan |
|
March 3, 2008, 15:57 |
Re: Difference in lift, inviscid comp. to viscid
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Dear Stephan,
Are you comparing two different turbulence models? Opaque |
|
March 4, 2008, 15:28 |
Re: Difference in lift, inviscid comp. to viscid
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Dear Opaque,
thanks for answering. The purpose of my simulations is to find out whether I can use the inviscid (Euler-) solver to get the lift distribution without a major error or how big this error would be. The only turbulence model I used so far to compare the inviscid results to was the k-epsilon (realizable) model. Greetings Stephan |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Difference between Volume Fraction and Mass Fraction in CEL | foo7 | CFX | 0 | September 21, 2011 09:45 |
Saffman Lift Force: confused | CFD_MAN | FLUENT | 5 | September 9, 2010 05:51 |
Thin foil analsis (sail) - Lift Coeff Problem | Kelvin | CFX | 3 | December 22, 2008 17:22 |
Inviscid Drag at subsonic, subcritical Mach # | Axel Rohde | Main CFD Forum | 1 | November 19, 2001 13:19 |
How is lift generated at airfoils ? | Victor Serov | Main CFD Forum | 19 | August 16, 1999 00:45 |