|
[Sponsors] |
November 9, 2007, 17:31 |
Mesh too fine
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hello,
Will too fine a mesh results in inaccuracy of the results in turbulence modelling? Sham. |
|
November 10, 2007, 12:06 |
Re: Mesh too fine
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
sometimes the RSM model is not easy to converge when the grid is too fine. But always the quality of grid is more important! I am still wondering!
jason |
|
November 19, 2007, 06:51 |
Re: Mesh too fine
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Steady or unsteady?
|
|
November 20, 2007, 03:24 |
Re: Mesh too fine
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
unsteady
|
|
November 20, 2007, 07:04 |
Re: Mesh too fine
|
#5 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
As the mesh is refined time step should also decrease.
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
how to set periodic boundary conditions | Ganesh | FLUENT | 15 | November 18, 2020 07:09 |
[ICEM] Hexa mesh, curve mesh setup, bunching law | Anorky | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 4 | November 12, 2014 01:27 |
[ICEM] Negative volume error in hybrid mesh | siw | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 4 | September 3, 2014 06:25 |
Mesh motion with Translation & Rotation | Doginal | CFX | 2 | January 12, 2014 07:21 |
engrid -> save as .stl with boundarie codes | Zymon | enGrid | 31 | August 29, 2011 14:40 |