|
[Sponsors] |
modelling inviscid 2D flow at high angle of attack |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
October 30, 2007, 09:44 |
modelling inviscid 2D flow at high angle of attack
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi there!
It happens that when I try to solve the inviscid incompressible flow around a 2D airfoil set at high angle of attack (say ~ 25 degrees) the solution shows a sort of ficticius separated boundary layer on upper surface or, if one prefers, there is no Kutta condition verified at trailing edge. Can anyone help me with this? Any suggestion on how I can obtain a solution similar to that coming from panel methods where the Kutta condition is explicitly imposed so that the solution does not depend on the value of angle of attack chosen? Many Thanks Ferdinando |
|
October 30, 2007, 12:04 |
Re: modelling inviscid 2D flow at high angle of at
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Dear Ferdinando Inviscid model refer to that fluid assume with no friction or shear stress, Kutta applied for non invisicd flow, try to make your model as turbulence or laminar (depend to reynold number)
|
|
October 30, 2007, 18:26 |
Re: modelling inviscid 2D flow at high angle of at
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Yes, Chandra is right. This is not supposed to work! There is no point in trying to do high angle of attack calculations of an incompressible inviscid fluid. It doesn't exist, and if it gave the same answer for this as the panel code I would be really worried about Fluent.
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
mass flow in is not equal to mass flow out | saii | CFX | 12 | March 19, 2018 06:21 |
convegence problem with high angle of attack | littlelz | CFX | 2 | October 28, 2009 07:07 |
not convergence in high angle of attack in low reynold number | nuimlabib | Main CFD Forum | 1 | October 2, 2009 15:10 |
Advice on multi-phase flow modelling | Martin | Main CFD Forum | 3 | October 14, 2008 06:16 |
Modelling flow over airfoil at near stall angle | Kelvin | FLUENT | 5 | June 6, 2007 03:00 |