|
[Sponsors] |
October 22, 2007, 08:21 |
nonpremixed combustion modeling
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi, I am kinda confused a little. I am trying to simulate an adiabatic non-premixed combustion of a burner by using the mixture fraction modeling. And with the calculated look-up table I can find the mass fractions, density and temperature. So if I enable the energy-equation, the temperature will be acquired by solving the energy-eq and not by looking it up?
I am now running a simulation with and one without the energy equation. What differences can I expect? Thanks in advance, leo. |
|
October 22, 2007, 08:34 |
Re: nonpremixed combustion modeling
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
hi, You have to enable the energy equation otherwise in temperature you can find more difference during post processing
let me know one thing have you done in 3D or its 2D analysis In which application are u using it kind regards, hari v.b. |
|
October 22, 2007, 09:07 |
Re: nonpremixed combustion modeling
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
hey, I thought that I only need to enable the energy equation if I simulate a NON-adiabatic system? Or if I enable a radiation model within my combustion?
I am modeling a vertical cilindrical combuster chamber, from underneath I got a gaseous fuel and air in the same direction. fuelinlet is a circular inlet and air is a outer ring inlet. thus 3d leo |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Nonpremixed Combustion Model for Coal Gasification | C.Y.Ler | FLUENT | 2 | April 29, 2014 09:51 |
Combustion modeling | SuperPahan | CFX | 6 | September 9, 2010 12:57 |
combustion modeling in CFX | info_bahaider | CFX | 1 | August 23, 2009 09:28 |
A role of combustion modeling in flow solver? | Yoon | Main CFD Forum | 0 | November 26, 2006 13:00 |
Combustion Modeling | Pravin Naphade | FLUENT | 0 | May 27, 2004 03:51 |