|
[Sponsors] |
modeling interface in conjugate heat transfer |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
October 5, 2007, 14:24 |
modeling interface in conjugate heat transfer
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hello I am modeling conjugate heat transfer in a channel with thick walls. The fluid is air and solid zone is silicon. The fluid is entering at the 1m/s and 350K. There is no heat flux applied anywhere and all the wall are adiabatic. The solution is initialized with 300K and I expect to get the isothermal temperature distribution in the system but temperature is increasing to 5000K. I think the problem is at the interface between solid and fluid zone. I have coupled the walls at the interface. Can anybody tell what should be the right boundary conditions at the interface?
Vivek |
|
October 5, 2007, 14:34 |
Re: modeling interface in conjugate heat transfer
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
U dont need to define any boundary condition at solid-fluid interface....its just the interface should be coupled and would appear as face and face shadow....well..about temperature...5000K may means ur case didnt converge??? i guess temperature of the fluid at the inlet of teh system is lot less than 5000K
|
|
October 5, 2007, 19:09 |
Re: modeling interface in conjugate heat transfer
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I haven't defined any BC at the interface...energy residual is less than 10^-8 but the temperature keeps increasing till it reaches 5000K. The inlet temperature is 350K....If I change the working fluid from air to water the solution converges....Also if I remove the solid zone and just solve for the fluid zone I get the correct result...but when I am including both solid and fluid it is acting weirdly...I think fluent is not handling the interface properly...Has anybody experienced this problem....
|
|
October 11, 2007, 04:34 |
Re: modeling interface in conjugate heat transfer
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Connect the faces of the solid and the fluid region in GAMBIT itself. The face will automatically assume the BC of coupled wall with a shadow being created. Then try solving the problem in FLUENT.
Regards, Rameche Candane. S |
|
October 11, 2007, 18:49 |
Re: modeling interface in conjugate heat transfer
|
#5 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I am using coupled boundary condition...but still I am not getting the correct result...is coupled boundary condition the right BC???
|
|
October 12, 2007, 06:43 |
Re: modeling interface in conjugate heat transfer
|
#6 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Coupled wall is a BC that is automatically taken when a solid region and fluid region have a common interface. Its a 2 sided wall. I am sure that either you may not have connected the faces of the solid and fluid region properly or u might be having an extra face there. Check the gambit file r reconstruct the mesh file.
Regards, Rameche Candane |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[ICEM] Conjugate CFD - Heat Transfer mesh | Subhadeep | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 3 | May 31, 2011 13:14 |
Conjugate heat transfer problem | hvem10 | FLUENT | 2 | October 29, 2009 18:31 |
conjugate heat transfer | san | CFX | 9 | September 15, 2006 01:45 |
Conjugate Heat Transfer between fluid and solid | Li Yang | Main CFD Forum | 8 | March 27, 2004 12:05 |
Conjugate heat transfer (vs) periodic boundary | mp | FLUENT | 1 | January 13, 2003 02:38 |