|
[Sponsors] |
September 12, 2007, 09:08 |
Mesh: Surfaces not connected
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi all,
The model I'm working on has been imported from cad. I've already cleaned the geometry (merged the edges) but some surfaces dont share the same edges.. On this photo for example... the upper limit of surface #2 is made of numerous edges 1,2,3,4,5... while the lower limit of surface 1 is made by one edge (behind 1,2,3...) I tried to merge 1,2,3,4,5... into one virtual edge, but then I can't connect this one to the one from surface 1 (hope i'm clear enough..) Would you have any advice? What could I do, and is it really important for meshing/simulating ? Thanks a lot P.S: On the right handside of the photo, the blue lines are linked both to the surfaces 1 and 2.. very strange.. |
|
September 12, 2007, 10:43 |
Re: Mesh: Surfaces not connected
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
if you get troubles with the edges, delete the surface 2, delete all your edges (1,2,3,4,5) et then reconstruct your surface 2. if you still have problem, put your cad-file on a server, I'll take a look on it
|
|
September 12, 2007, 11:09 |
Re: Mesh: Surfaces not connected
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,
Ive already tried to delete the face and the edges 1,2,3.., but as my geometry is virtual, it wouldn't let me create a face there.. Here is my cad file: http://dl.free.fr/ciTWdzGhf/Mk7.zip Thanks for help! |
|
September 12, 2007, 12:11 |
Re: Mesh: Surfaces not connected
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
check your cad file, your surface may be crack or skretch.
|
|
September 12, 2007, 12:20 |
Re: Mesh: Surfaces not connected
|
#5 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
What do you mean by "surface may be crack or skretch" ?
|
|
September 13, 2007, 09:21 |
Re: Mesh: Surfaces not connected
|
#6 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi Babs. Your CAD geometry is quite poor. I have looked into it and I tried to mesh it myself. Since the geometry is filled with cracks and gaps I stayed away from Gambit and turned into ICEM CFD TETRA instead which works better with poor CAD. I managed to come up with decent mesh, using only 1 hour work. I've attached some plots of it so you can see the details of it. There are also 10 layers of prism cells around the fuselage, and I created a large box around it to generate the fluid volume. Also the wake is refined. The total number of elements is 720,000.
<center> </center> -Dr. Flow Squad http://tinyurl.com/2gkjh8 |
|
September 13, 2007, 10:04 |
Re: Mesh: Surfaces not connected
|
#7 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Oh... good job!
But the problem is that I only have gambit... do you have any advice to avoid having poor cad? (I made my cad with solid works) thanks |
|
September 14, 2007, 04:13 |
Re: Mesh: Surfaces not connected
|
#8 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
And here it is after running in Fluent. "Funny" Fluctuating Pressure Distribution.
|
|
September 17, 2007, 06:29 |
Re: Mesh: Surfaces not connected
|
#9 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Dear Babs you should check your geometry, for cad like your, better you creeate your CAD by surface not by substract your volume by onother volume, my experienced proof if we substract streeam line face by substrac to volume it will be hard, take a look in PRO-E to make surface profil or other CAD
Regards |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[snappyHexMesh] SnappyHexMesh for internal Flow | vishwa | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 24 | June 27, 2016 09:54 |
[ICEM] surface mesh merging problem | everest | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 44 | April 14, 2016 07:41 |
Moving mesh | Niklas Wikstrom (Wikstrom) | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 122 | June 15, 2014 07:20 |
CheckMeshbs errors | ivanyao | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | March 10, 2009 23:07 |
Icemcfd 11: Loss of mesh from surface mesh option? | Joe | CFX | 2 | March 26, 2007 19:10 |