|
[Sponsors] |
July 12, 2007, 10:24 |
Solving the turbulence equation
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hello, everyone. Now I am trying to model two-phase flow using Eulerian multiphase model with dispersed k-e model. However, I have a convergent problem. When I tried to ingore the turbulence equation in the solution panel, I found it converges well. Does anyone know that whether my solution is reasonable without the turbulence equation? Or is it possible that I will get some reasonable solution when I add this turbulence equation later? Thank you very much.
|
|
July 12, 2007, 11:13 |
Re: Solving the turbulence equation
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
You need to give much more explicit on what you are modelling for anyone to be able to answer your question.
|
|
July 12, 2007, 12:20 |
Re: Solving the turbulence equation
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
O.K. I am sorry that I stated my problem simply. Actually, I am trying to model air(gas)-water(liquid) two-phase flow problem using Eulerian multiphase model. It is unsteady solver with standard k-e turbulence model. I use vel-in for both phases and pressure-out boundary condiition. After the simulation runs, I noticed that the residual of the continuity is quite big (~ 0.1) and it stays flat. I tried to reduce the under-relaxation factor of momentum. The residual went down to ~ 0.001 but also stayed flat (did not converges!) Finally, I noticed that if I did not select the equations of turbulence under the panel of "solve->controls->solution", the residuals go down perfectly. I want to know the effect of the turbulence in the solving processing. Is it possible to get the reasonable solution in this way? BTW, I also tried to refine my mesh or reduce the time step during the calculation but the residuals did not go down. Thank you very much.
|
|
July 12, 2007, 17:30 |
Re: Solving the turbulence equation
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Turbulence is multiphase flow is a thorny issue ... Reynolds number dependancy etc.
|
|
July 13, 2007, 10:57 |
Re: Solving the turbulence equation
|
#5 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I use air-water two-phase flow. Since the superfacial velocity for air is about 0.23 m/s and for liquid is 2 m/s and the void fraction is 10%. The Reynolds number for gas is only 736 but for liquid is 1e5, which is quite large.
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
transsonic nozzle with rhoSimpleFoam | Unseen | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 8 | July 1, 2022 07:54 |
SimpleFoam k and epsilon bounded | nedved | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 16 | March 4, 2017 09:30 |
Calculation of the Governing Equations | Mihail | CFX | 7 | September 7, 2014 07:27 |
Problems with simulating TurbFOAM | barath.ezhilan | OpenFOAM | 13 | July 16, 2009 06:55 |
Could anybody help me see this error and give help | liugx212 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 3 | January 4, 2006 19:07 |