|
[Sponsors] |
May 10, 2007, 05:43 |
a simple theoretical doubt
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Imagine any 2d ordinary problem. We have already specified its boundary conditions ummm... lets say there is a body in free-flow, so we have wall, pressure inlet, pressure outlet, pressure farfield conditions.
Now in fluent, I have defined all the boundary conditions. Now when I initialize the flow(say at pressure inlet) I give in more information (like the velocity). Why is this required I mean why do I need to re-input the velocity when I have already given in enough information to fluent to compute the solution ?? any ideas ??! |
|
May 10, 2007, 18:28 |
Re: a simple theoretical doubt
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hello,
When you initialize in FLUENT, you are not providing any extra boundary conditions. It is to initialize all the variables through out the domain, for which you are solving for. This is the initial guess it takes in all the cells to start the solution. But it will take only the pressure BC you have provided and calculates the velocity from the given BC's. Guys, correct me if I am wrong some where..!! Regards AP |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SIMPLE algorithm in 3D cylindrical coordinates | zouchu | Main CFD Forum | 1 | January 20, 2014 18:02 |
Pls answer my simple doubt concerning pathlines | Jig | FLUENT | 13 | March 17, 2009 02:14 |
CO in fluent - Simple basic doubt plz help. | JACK HARI | FLUENT | 0 | December 22, 2007 02:35 |
PISO vs. SIMPLE | benedikt flurl | Main CFD Forum | 2 | April 14, 2005 07:54 |
SIMPLE algorithm | Jonathan Castro | Main CFD Forum | 3 | December 10, 1999 05:59 |