|
[Sponsors] |
April 29, 2007, 12:12 |
Pressure vs. Density based
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Dear all, I am calculating a compressible flow, a straight nozzle with high pressure at inlet. I am a mass flow inlet. What confuses me is that I get different results when using the pressure or density (coupled) based solver. All the settings are the same except selection of the solver. With the pressure solver I predict a Mach number on 1.4 at the inlet and with the density based is the Mach number 0.9. Hence velocity and pressures at the inlet face is also different.
Both solvers should give the same results if the solution is converged and it is. Any clue/help Regards Jan |
|
May 2, 2007, 16:12 |
Re: Pressure vs. Density based
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,
I study also in a laval nozzle with high pressure inlet and also I have the same question. Did you have any answer for your problem. |
|
May 3, 2007, 04:45 |
Re: Pressure vs. Density based
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I did not get an answer on CFD online, but I have been told that it has to do with the interpolation scheme for the 2 solvers. A finere grid is required for the pressure based solver and if difference is seen in the results then it is probably due to a too coarse grid, no mesh independancy
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Problem with rhoSimpleFoam : exploding enthalpy and density at the walls | david39 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 6 | January 18, 2011 12:49 |
regarding density and pressure based solver | Reddy | CFX | 3 | October 11, 2007 04:08 |
Neumann pressure BC and velocity field | Antech | Main CFD Forum | 0 | April 25, 2006 03:15 |
Hydrostatic pressure in 2-phase flow modeling (CFX4.2) | HB &DS | CFX | 0 | January 9, 2000 14:19 |
Density based codes? | H.S.Muralidhara | Main CFD Forum | 3 | May 28, 1999 07:29 |