|
[Sponsors] |
April 19, 2007, 16:11 |
The incompatible of UDF
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hello, everyone. I have a problem of compiling my UDF. Previously, I use version FLUENT 6.2.16 and compiled some UDFs, which really worked for me. Today, a new version FLUENT 6.3 is served for me. When I tried to load the UDFs, it said that it is incompatible. Does anyone meet such problems before? How to deal with this problem? Thanks in advance!
|
|
April 20, 2007, 06:04 |
Re: The incompatible of UDF
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
why not use the old version for your simulation if the new version cannot provide additional benefit or significant improvement for your case?
|
|
April 20, 2007, 09:20 |
Re: The incompatible of UDF
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
The thing is that I am using the FLUENT from OSU supercomputer center and it seems that I could not choose which version I will use. The good news is that I have solved this problem. This morning I deleted all the old files from UDF and compiled it again, and the new generated libuf works for me. I think probably it is the way to solve this problem. Thank you any way.
|
|
April 23, 2007, 05:11 |
Re: The incompatible of UDF
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
you can try the option -r6.2.16 for the old version of FLUENT.
For example: fluent -r6.2.16 2ddp |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Dynamic Mesh UDF | Qureshi | FLUENT | 7 | March 23, 2017 08:37 |
UDF parallel error: chip-exec: function not found????? | shankara.2 | Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming | 1 | January 16, 2012 23:14 |
How to add a UDF to a compiled UDF library | kim | FLUENT | 3 | October 26, 2011 22:38 |
UDF...UDF...UDF...UDF | Luc SEMINEL | FLUENT | 0 | November 25, 2002 05:03 |
UDF, UDF, UDF, UDF | Luc SEMINEL | Main CFD Forum | 0 | November 25, 2002 05:01 |