|
[Sponsors] |
March 21, 2007, 11:08 |
2D axisymmetry Vs non-axisymmetry geometry
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi, I am trying to simulate two-phase flow in cylindrical airlift reactor using both axisymmetry and non-axisymmetry 2D domains. My question is how Fluent assumes the non-axisymmetry domain? (i.e., cylindrical or rectangular or just as a plane surface).
I found out that when I use an axisymmetric domain, the calculated flow rate (based on the surface area) in and out of the domain is the same as FLUENT reports. However, for the same inlet conditions, the flow rates reported by FLUENT in 2D non-axisymmetry simulations are not same as those calculated by me. I back calculated these reported flow rates and found that they corresponded to the value of inlet length (diameter) taken as the surface area. For example if the diameter of the inlet is 0.1 m, the flow rate reported by fluent is based on 0.1 Sq. m. area while the area should actually be = Î *R2 = Î *(0.1/2)2 When i compare the predictions, the axisymmetry results compare very well with experiments but the non-axisymmetry results do not. I was expecting both the simulations results to be same. Could anyone explain about this discrepency? any help is greatly appreciated. |
|
March 21, 2007, 16:01 |
Re: 2D axisymmetry Vs non-axisymmetry geometry
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
2D with out axisymmetry is a domain without any gradient along z direction. I fluent it report as a domain with 1 m thickness in z direction.
|
|
March 22, 2007, 09:05 |
Re: 2D axisymmetry Vs non-axisymmetry geometry
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Thanks fro the reply Sujith, So does that mean performing a non-axisymmetry simulations for a cylindrical domain is not acceptable?
|
|
March 22, 2007, 09:26 |
Re: 2D axisymmetry Vs non-axisymmetry geometry
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Thanks fro the reply Sujith, So does that mean performing a non-axisymmetry simulations for a cylindrical domain is not acceptable?
|
|
March 22, 2007, 09:33 |
Re: 2D axisymmetry Vs non-axisymmetry geometry
|
#5 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
for cylindrical geometry axysymmetry is used.
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Question about Geometry vs. Meshes | EphemeralMemory | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 2 | December 8, 2016 14:02 |
Problem Importing Geometry ProE to CFX | fatb0y | CFX | 3 | January 14, 2012 20:42 |
[Gmsh] Problem meshing an imported geometry | Alicia | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 0 | March 30, 2010 05:53 |
Simulation of Flow through Complex 3D Geometry | EmersonKB | CFX | 5 | July 2, 2009 09:17 |
vitual _ real | deneb | FLUENT | 3 | January 22, 2007 05:31 |