|
[Sponsors] |
January 10, 2007, 12:20 |
Can circum-avg-axial give flow rate?
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I've been using Fluent for a while now, and I've noticed that something is very odd about the circum-avg-axial function. In simulating incompressible flow through any internal geometry, the average value of axial velocity should remain constant (with a weighting factor of the local radius). In simulating a pipe constriction, resulting in backflow, the average of axial velocity should remain also remain constant with weighting of r (integral of u dot n r dr d theta= flow rate = constant).
When I run circum-avg-axial on the constriction geometry ( axial velocity times the radius) however, I do not get a constant value. The value fluctuates wildly, especially around the region of the geometry change. I have tried the circum-avg-axial of: axial-velocity axial-velocity * radial coordinate axial-velocity * radial coordinate ^ 2 I do not think any of these is giving me the equivalent to the local flow rate. Why does circum-avg-axial give this wrong output? Or what function combination should I be using to calculate the flow rate from axial velocity at a given axial distance down my pipe? It is important that I get flow rate at a specific axial distance-- such as z = 1 or 2, and not flow rate on the entire interior. Thanks in advance for your help, Amit |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Mass flow rate at the outlet | tejasvikrishna | FLUENT | 2 | May 25, 2013 03:42 |
Mass Flow Rate is not converging | destgir448 | CFX | 5 | December 11, 2010 06:55 |
How to change from mass flow to volume flow rate | stanley | FLUENT | 1 | February 2, 2007 07:44 |
mass flow inlet | Denis Tschumperle | FLUENT | 7 | August 9, 2000 03:19 |
fluid flow fundas | ram | Main CFD Forum | 5 | June 17, 2000 22:31 |