|
[Sponsors] |
January 2, 2007, 18:32 |
FLuent CAvitation Model requires Turbulence?
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hello
Can fluent's mixture model be used without turbulence..if so ..please check the rate of evaporation and condensation rates where Characteristic velocity = sqrt(turbulent kinetic energy)..if TKE =0 (no turbulence considered) source terms are zero ?! If I use laminar flow, how is the source computed? Thanks CFDtoy |
|
January 12, 2007, 02:57 |
Re: FLuent CAvitation Model requires Turbulence?
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I guess you should consider turbulent flow...I don't remember seeing laminar flow with cavitation, yet.
MAteus |
|
January 12, 2007, 11:27 |
Re: FLuent CAvitation Model requires Turbulence?
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Thanks for your reply MA
If I do cavitation with no turbulence..it still works ! i dont knw how they manage to get the evaporation and condensation working without the "k" in their equation sounds interesting.. Many of the works in cav actually use a lam assumption since the cavitation effective viscosity >> turbulent effects...so ..kinda neglected. But, anyways, I was wondering about fluent's ability...now with lam i can see it works but ..jus cant find how ! CFDtoy |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Integration of a Custom C++ Model into FLUENT | Syed Haider | FLUENT | 2 | March 7, 2018 00:37 |
Turbulence postprocessing | Mohsin | FLUENT | 2 | October 3, 2016 15:18 |
turbulence model equation | Andy Chen | FLOW-3D | 4 | January 1, 2010 22:45 |
convergence problem with FLUENT cavitation model | Belete Kiflie | FLUENT | 3 | February 20, 2006 11:16 |
Why Turbulence models are not universal. | Senthil | Main CFD Forum | 4 | July 5, 2000 05:34 |