CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

periodic condition at parallel solver

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   October 18, 2006, 11:38
Default periodic condition at parallel solver
  #1
Amer Mahmood
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Dear Fluent users,

I am simulating water flow in rectangular duct with periodic B.C. at inlet & outlet. If I read the grid in Fluent6.2 on single cpu, grid check command gives no errors. On the other hand if i read same grid using 4cpu parallel machine, grid check gives warning and fails. The printed warning is "incorrect face count".

I will be thankful if any of you can tell me the solution to this problem.

Thanks

Amer
  Reply With Quote

Old   October 18, 2006, 13:20
Default Re: periodic condition at parallel solver
  #2
Jason
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Don't setup your periodic geometry in parallel if you can help it. I don't know if they fixed this problem in 6.3, but its a common problem in 6.2 (and most earlier releases I believe). It has to do with how the periodic boundaries are sent out to the different nodes. Sometimes it'll work, but most times it won't.

Setup your geometry on the single machine (I recommend doing BCs, models, monitors, etc... everything so that all you have to do when you read it later is initialize and run), then go to Parallel->Partition and define how you want to partition your grid (usually I use Principle Axis and only change the number of partitions I plan on using... I leave everything else the same, but you can play around with the settings to try to improve the partitioning for your particular problem). Then write the case. Once you have a partitioned case written, you can read it into a parallel Fluent process and you should be good to go.

Hope this helps, and good luck, Jason
  Reply With Quote

Old   October 18, 2006, 17:14
Default Re: periodic condition at parallel solver
  #3
Amer Mahmood
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
thankyou Jason. I will try this.

Amer
  Reply With Quote

Old   October 28, 2019, 09:34
Default
  #4
Member
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 31
Rep Power: 10
hyugakojiro999 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason
;136392
Don't setup your periodic geometry in parallel if you can help it. I don't know if they fixed this problem in 6.3, but its a common problem in 6.2 (and most earlier releases I believe). It has to do with how the periodic boundaries are sent out to the different nodes. Sometimes it'll work, but most times it won't.

Setup your geometry on the single machine (I recommend doing BCs, models, monitors, etc... everything so that all you have to do when you read it later is initialize and run), then go to Parallel->Partition and define how you want to partition your grid (usually I use Principle Axis and only change the number of partitions I plan on using... I leave everything else the same, but you can play around with the settings to try to improve the partitioning for your particular problem). Then write the case. Once you have a partitioned case written, you can read it into a parallel Fluent process and you should be good to go.

Hope this helps, and good luck, Jason

didnt work for 18.1
hyugakojiro999 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Help, about periodic condition caohan FLUENT 6 September 20, 2013 04:14
Quarter Burner mesh with periosic condition SamCanuck FLUENT 2 August 31, 2011 12:34
UDF problem with Parallel Solver manu FLUENT 0 January 24, 2008 15:31
Periodic boundary condition & Unsteady flow Somchai FLUENT 2 March 28, 2006 09:51
periodic boundary condition tucker FLUENT 3 May 23, 2005 07:56


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:01.