|
[Sponsors] |
August 31, 2006, 17:37 |
Eulerian Model
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi Cadaie I have a Zone where I want to patch my secondary (granular) phase to "1". If I use packing limit say "0.8", it reduces the volume fraction of granular phase to 0.8 right away which is understandable. If I patch volume fraction of 1 in that zone and use packing limit of 1 it diverges. What do u suggest? Should I make a bigger volume zone and patch my volume fraction of granular phase to 0.7 or 0.8 accordingly to match my total amount of granular phase and use packing limit of 1 or 0.8 or more than that. Do u think it's a good idea?
Thanks |
|
August 31, 2006, 19:09 |
Re: Eulerian Model
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Is there a reason why you need to use a packing limit of 1?
I think the reason the solution diverges using a limit of 1 is because the primary phase has to have a volume fraction greater than 0 in each cell. Your suggestion of patching a bigger volume seems like the best approach because very high packing limits are not physically realistic. |
|
September 1, 2006, 08:39 |
Re: Eulerian Model
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
thanks Cadaei
that is what i am goona do now. Hassan |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Superlinear speedup in OpenFOAM 13 | msrinath80 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 18 | March 3, 2015 06:36 |
question about eulerian model for packed bed | rone | FLUENT | 2 | July 19, 2007 21:58 |
Mass and het transfer using eulerian model | Pablo | FLUENT | 0 | February 16, 2007 09:36 |
the Eulerian model and the lower volume fraction | hx li | FLUENT | 2 | October 27, 2005 07:17 |
Strain Rate in eulerian model | galeazzo | FLUENT | 0 | January 25, 2005 08:52 |