|
[Sponsors] |
August 26, 2006, 06:19 |
enhanced wall treatment
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Dear users I'm simulating a closed cavity with Flunt 6 .. Realizable... but I dont know what wall function i should use for modeling it . my problem have 2 walls with heat flux and i'm validating with a paper written by Kenjeres ... so i should solve my problem with high accuracy .. I search help contents of Fluent but .. there is;nt any subject about enhanced wall treatment .. If its possible fou you please send me some information about it tanks...saeed
|
|
August 29, 2006, 12:19 |
Re: enhanced wall treatment
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
The enhanced wall treatment is nothing more than stacking cells against the walls to resulve the boundary later. Put a bunch of cells near the walls and solve. Then check y+. If y+ is about 1, your OK. For y+ >> 1 add cells near the wall. For y+ << 1, reduce the number of cells.
|
|
August 30, 2006, 04:58 |
Re: enhanced wall treatment
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I thought that if the y+ was <<1 it was ok, wasn't it? Lower y+ you have better the results will be. Is this false?
|
|
August 31, 2006, 12:47 |
Re: enhanced wall treatment
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Yeah, my mistake. You can't have too low a y+.
|
|
September 5, 2006, 05:44 |
Re: enhanced wall treatment
|
#5 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Do you know how the results are affected by imposing a wrong y+? I mean If what I want to know is the temperature distribution along a wall a wrong y+ can vary the results severly? Do you trust in an other viscosity model?
|
|
September 6, 2006, 12:38 |
Re: enhanced wall treatment
|
#6 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
You cannot have multiple layers of elements all using the log law. The wall function would be applied to the first one only, even through others will be in the boundary layer. Thus, the boundary layer thickness would be too low. Switch to enhanced wall treatment of the y+ is too small for standard wall functions.
It is an extreme generalization (with plenty of exceptions) that you probably should not use standard wall functions when wall flows are critical. So, for the flow in a large room, wall functions are usually OK. For flow between two closely spaced plates, the usually are not OK. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Very technical question about solving wall boundary layer ... | jlb001 | FLUENT | 6 | December 27, 2014 06:56 |
Near Wall treatment | sven | OpenFOAM | 1 | September 13, 2009 21:57 |
Enhanced wall treatment with user-defined mu_t | tstorm | FLUENT | 0 | August 20, 2009 14:05 |
LES wall treatment | Valerio | FLUENT | 0 | April 26, 2008 08:12 |
help on wall treatment | zwdi | FLUENT | 2 | December 6, 2004 13:45 |