|
[Sponsors] |
why RNG k-e is better & what does RNG really mean? |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
August 7, 2006, 23:01 |
why RNG k-e is better & what does RNG really mean?
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,
I don't fully understand why RNG k-e model is better than k-e modle? Does it solve more internediate variables, thus more computationally expensive? Since no classic textbook introduces RNG k-e model, I asked some CFD professors, but they cannot explain clearly to me why we need "RNG" tech? One of them just said that RNG is an "old" method after LES has been developed. Any advice? Thank you. Bo |
|
August 8, 2006, 10:14 |
Re: why RNG k-e is better & what does RNG really m
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
The RNG model uses a mathematical analysis called renormalization group theory to derive the constants in the k and e equations. In the standard k-e model the contants are entirely based on experimental data and are only applicable to the type of flow the constants are based on.
Since the RNG constants are derived from theory the model is applicable to a wider range of flows. As far as I can remember the RNG model only has one extra pressure strain term than the standard k-e. The RNG is therfore only slightly more computationally expensive and yields more accurate results. The LES model gives far better results than RNG but the grid requirements for LES make it very time consuming. The model to use depends on what you are trying to analyze and the resources that you have. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
RNG k-epsilon model implementation | romant | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 2 | June 20, 2018 09:33 |
HELP!! Prandtl numbers in RNG k-e turbulence model | maoasis | FLUENT | 0 | April 24, 2006 11:51 |
RNG k-e equation | Mahshid | Fidelity CFD | 0 | October 24, 2005 10:51 |
rng les | zxaar | FLUENT | 0 | May 18, 2005 02:16 |
RNG with Schemit number | zwdi | FLUENT | 0 | August 2, 2004 12:54 |