|
[Sponsors] |
August 1, 2006, 01:48 |
FIDAP vs. FLUENT
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Does anyone know the different between Fidap and Fluent?
|
|
August 1, 2006, 11:06 |
Re: FIDAP vs. FLUENT
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
One would be FIDAP is finite-element based, where Fluent is finite-volume based.
|
|
August 2, 2006, 10:40 |
Re: FIDAP vs. FLUENT
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Dear Myron, Thx for yr reply. The reason I asked was, I want to know if Fluent deals with free surface (interface) better than Fidap. Or vice versa.
|
|
August 3, 2006, 00:52 |
Re: FIDAP vs. FLUENT
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
The real question is do you really want to bother to set up a case in FIDAP ???? i promise a painful time
|
|
August 9, 2006, 12:27 |
Re: FIDAP vs. FLUENT
|
#5 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Really? If so, the answer is no. I will keep my fluent model. But at this moment, I need to hook udf for the dynamic contact angle. I need to use fluent 6.3 beta version.
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
problem of running parallel Fluent on linux cluster | ivanbuz | FLUENT | 15 | September 23, 2017 20:12 |
Abaqus - Fluent Coupling WITHOUT MPCCI | s.mishra | FLUENT | 1 | April 5, 2016 07:47 |
user guide of fluent fidap | ztdep | FLUENT | 1 | April 4, 2006 15:29 |
Fluent or Fidap? | Ravi | FLUENT | 1 | January 25, 2006 03:35 |
Fluent vs. Fidap | Lisa Eastep | Main CFD Forum | 1 | July 16, 1999 01:13 |