|
[Sponsors] |
HELP!! Prandtl numbers in RNG k-e turbulence model |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
April 24, 2006, 11:51 |
HELP!! Prandtl numbers in RNG k-e turbulence model
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
According to the RNG theory, the inverse effective Prandtl numbers for K and e is about 1.393 in the high-Reynolds-number limit. That means the Prandtl numbers for k and the Prandtl numbers for k e are the same and equal to 0.7179.
I want to use RNG k-e turbulence model to run my case --the wind flow through the buildings. I know the contants of Cmu, C1e, C2e, Prandtl numbers for k and Prandtl numbers for e for RNG k-e turbulence model. But how can I define the Prandtl numbers for k 0.7179 and Prandtl numbers for e 0.7179 in Fluent when I use RNG k-e turbulence model? |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
multiphaseInterFoam for RAS turbulence model | chiven | OpenFOAM Bugs | 8 | December 6, 2017 03:08 |
Turbulence Model and limitation to Reynolds number | qascapri | FLUENT | 0 | January 24, 2011 11:48 |
Sato's model of bubble induced turbulence | ukbid | CFX | 0 | January 3, 2011 10:04 |
effective viscosity in RNG k-e turbulence model | Ellen | Main CFD Forum | 1 | August 20, 2002 03:20 |