|
[Sponsors] |
April 3, 2006, 14:19 |
pressure coefficient
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Dear friends,
After solution was converged and y+ < 400, the pressure coefficent was still larger than what I expected when just setting the free stream velocity at the inlet boundary as reference velocity. Now the result is 1.26, but in thetheory, it should be 0.7~0.9. Could you tell me what the problem is? Thanks in advance, Justin |
|
April 4, 2006, 14:30 |
Re: pressure coefficient
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
What is tubulence model? What is the kind of near wall treatment you are using? What is the geometry? Is there flow separation taking place? If yes, then limit the y+ and bing it below 150 or so.
Use enhanced wall function approach and then report the results again. |
|
April 5, 2006, 07:43 |
Re: pressure coefficient
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Thanks. Now I am studying wind environemnt around buildings. The used turbulence model and wall function are rng k-eps and standard funaction. the domain and model are boxes. The separation really occured. The problem is that if I set the lower y+ max allowed, the size of cas and dat files will increase from 150Mb to 800Mb and it will affect the speed of calculation. Can I just make the y+ of near the model wall lower than 150 and keep the other wall about 400?
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Pressure coefficient | Giuseppe | FLUENT | 2 | July 26, 2015 04:19 |
How to apply negtive pressure to outlet | bioman66 | CFX | 5 | June 3, 2006 02:40 |
pressure gradient term in low speed flow | Atit Koonsrisuk | Main CFD Forum | 2 | January 10, 2002 11:52 |
Hydrostatic pressure in 2-phase flow modeling (long) | DS & HB | Main CFD Forum | 0 | January 8, 2000 16:00 |
Problem in Result of the pressure coefficient | Ken Choi | Main CFD Forum | 2 | March 15, 1999 05:15 |