|
[Sponsors] |
March 14, 2006, 02:42 |
Turbulence models and boundary layer
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi
FLUENT documentation says that for standard wall functions you should create model with Yplus in the range 30-60. How can I estimate the error for my case if Yplus is much smaller? I realized that there are a lot of areas with Yplus about 1-5. Is the result totally incorrect? And what should I do if there are a wide range of velocities in my model (0.1-5 m/s in stagnation zones and up to 40 m/s in other zones)? What turbulence model should I use? I don't think that I should greately coarse mesh in stagnation zones because I will get very big cells and geometry features will not catched. Am I right? Thanks a lot for any help. |
|
March 14, 2006, 06:55 |
Re: Turbulence models and boundary layer
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Use Enhanced Wall Treatment (EWT), it is supposed to minimise error when y+ is around 11, and extends validity of wall functions to all range of possible y+ values. BUT this is advisable to do only if mean y+ is towards 1, not 30. In your case, it is better to make a y+ adaption to get it to 1 (you say that coarsening the grid would be inappropriate), or remake the grid near the body. Then simply choose a low-Re model (like S-A or k-w [with "transitional flow" option activated]), or a high-Re model with EWT (k-e or RSM).
Razvan |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Wind turbine simulation | Saturn | CFX | 60 | July 17, 2024 06:45 |
Accuracy of Boundary Layers With Turbulence Models | de5truction | FLUENT | 2 | June 3, 2011 19:36 |
RPM in Wind Turbine | Pankaj | CFX | 9 | November 23, 2009 05:05 |
Convective Heat Transfer - Heat Exchanger | Mark | CFX | 6 | November 15, 2004 16:55 |