|
[Sponsors] |
March 9, 2006, 04:25 |
Accuracy of a surfacic mesh in Gambit
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi all
To mesh a triangular face,I mesh the edges first to get the vertex distribution I want and then I do the surface meshing. The surfacic mesh I get doesn't exactly match the surface of the CAD model face (1 edge isn't exactly located on the boundary edge of the CAD face...), so I assume that my CAD model would be altered with such a mesh. Any advice? Regards |
|
March 9, 2006, 05:28 |
Re: Accuracy of a surfacic mesh in Gambit
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Well, every time you discretize a continuum domain you accept a certain error in the modeling (think of a continuous curve approximated by little segments)...the mesh should be finer not only when particular flow situation are expected (free surfaces, for examples, or shock waves), but obviously also where the domain is geometrically complex.
Edi. |
|
March 9, 2006, 06:33 |
Re: Accuracy of a surfacic mesh in Gambit
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
we agree on that, for sure!
I've encountered the pb on a straight line, though... The thing is, I've given cell size constraints, so it seems to me that Gambit can't satisfy all my preferences. But I'd rather like my mesh to follow the CAD model instead of the size setup. what do you think? |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Moving mesh | Niklas Wikstrom (Wikstrom) | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 122 | June 15, 2014 07:20 |
[snappyHexMesh] snappyHexMesh won't work - zeros everywhere! | sc298 | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 2 | March 27, 2011 22:11 |
Convergence moving mesh | lr103476 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 30 | November 19, 2007 15:09 |
How to mesh a circle by Gambit? | Zhengcai Ye | FLUENT | 5 | March 24, 2006 02:04 |
3-D Mesh Check in Gambit..... | SHR | FLUENT | 4 | March 25, 2003 04:10 |