|
[Sponsors] |
March 8, 2006, 05:27 |
BC for a wind tunnel
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
hi all
I'd like to simulate a typical problem: a car in a wind tunnel, to get correlation with real tests. I've read many articles that say the BC type to apply for the top and external side walls is the symmetry one. But why??? In a real wind tunnel, the top and side walls are not moving and they (unfortunately) interfere with the tested model: the properties of symmetry BC (all gradients = 0, I guess) are thus not always verified. Shouldn't be more appropriate to simply use stationnary walls? Please give me your ideas. regards |
|
March 8, 2006, 06:06 |
Re: BC for a wind tunnel
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
the wind tunnels they may be very large such that the interaction of the flow is negligible and the gradients will be zero so i think symmetry conditions are perfect.
|
|
March 8, 2006, 06:42 |
Re: BC for a wind tunnel
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
If you belive that the tunnel walls influence the flow arround the car you should definetelly use stationary wals with (for example) wall functions. But in most applications the walls are far enough from the model so that they don't influence is (at least it should be so). Then you can use symmetry which is in essence wall with free slip condition. This will symplify your simulation and decrease comp. time.
by MATEUS |
|
March 8, 2006, 07:23 |
Re: BC for a wind tunnel
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
OK, this is the confirmation I neeeded ;o))) I thank you both
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
flow in cyclic wind tunnel | yogesh@cfd | Main CFD Forum | 0 | November 8, 2010 05:28 |
wind tunnel results vs fluent | pixie | Main CFD Forum | 1 | August 20, 2009 09:02 |
how to consider perforated wind tunnel wall in CFD simulation | littlelz | CFX | 4 | June 11, 2009 06:51 |
Virtual Wind Tunnel in FLUENT | ND | FLUENT | 0 | April 7, 2006 08:43 |
Wind Tunnel Website now online | Mike Worthey | Main CFD Forum | 0 | June 6, 2000 03:27 |